Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Cut Thread

Floppin

By Floppin,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

fieryprophet Newbie

fieryprophet

Posted
Posted

Cutting Bryant will come back to bite us in the ass. Just watch.

I dunno about that. I just rewatched that TD play and unless the play called for a deep pass just outside the sideline (unlikely given the situation) it looks like he ran his route at a bad angle and recovered only because the throw was a jump ball. A lot of chatter during camp was that he had a some physical tools but was very sloppy in his routes and hit-or-miss catching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted

I dunno about that. I just rewatched that TD play and unless the play called for a deep pass just outside the sideline (unlikely given the situation) it looks like he ran his route at a bad angle and recovered only because the throw was a jump ball. A lot of chatter during camp was that he had a some physical tools but was very sloppy in his routes and hit-or-miss catching.

Yeah, but I'm still surprised we let him go in favor of guys like Brockel, Clausen, etc., who are minimal contributors to this team in the foreseeable future. I mention Brockel specifically, because wasn't Bryant the guy that played TE at Morgan St.? Seems to me you could find a place to put someone with his size and athleticism. To be that big and be able to maneuver yourself like that... Not many guys can do it.

I seriously doubt he makes it to our PS, or if he does, he won't stay there long.

Remember, Victor Cruz was cut by the Jets...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

oh and why is jimmy still here haahhaa wtf!!!???? shocked does not begin to explain how confused I am but thats why I love being a fan.

Dirt cheap #3 QB who knows the system. Is the same as any other #3QB we would carry....except that someone like Seneca Wallace would cost over twice as much. This, and the fact that Rivera likes the chemistry in the QB meetings and film room. No need to screw with that for a change at your third QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

Yeah, but I'm still surprised we let him go in favor of guys like Brockel, Clausen, etc., who are minimal contributors to this team in the foreseeable future. I mention Brockel specifically, because wasn't Bryant the guy that played TE at Morgan St.? Seems to me you could find a place to put someone with his size and athleticism. To be that big and be able to maneuver yourself like that... Not many guys can do it.

I seriously doubt he makes it to our PS, or if he does, he won't stay there long.

Brockel is your #2 FB...value at TE...and plays ST. That is much more valuable to this team than the #6 WR who won't even dress for games.

Remember, Victor Cruz was cut by the Jets...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • csx
      Quick FYI

      By csx · Posted

      Get well
    • PanthersGTI
      Kyle trask released by bucs

      By PanthersGTI · Posted

      He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • d-dave
      Experience with Electric Vehicles?

      By d-dave · Posted

      Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...