Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Football Gameplan's 2012 Wk 2 Panthers vs Saints* Preview


FootballCzar

Recommended Posts

understandable and reasonable...but i wouldn't say that the bucs had success running against us last week. 3.6 ypa and 130 yards with no TDs isn't what i call success. they didn't really do anything well on offense. they won because the carolina offense couldn't get going and i don't know that the Saints* D will be able to do to the panthers what the bucs did. the Saints* just don't have the discipline needed on either side of the ball, really, with payton gone.

if it comes down to leadership, discipline, and focus, panthers are going to win. they are much more likely to be able to pull it together than the Saints*.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

understandable and reasonable...but i wouldn't say that the bucs had success running against us last week. 3.6 ypa and 130 yards with no TDs isn't what i call success. they didn't really do anything well on offense. they won because the carolina offense couldn't get going and i don't know that the Saints** D will be able to do to the panthers what the bucs did. the Saints** just don't have the discipline needed on either side of the ball, really, with payton gone.

if it comes down to leadership, discipline, and focus, panthers are going to win. they are much more likely to be able to pull it together than the Saints**.

The Bucs running allowed them to control the clock..and that's essentially what you look for when you run the ball.

I don't trust the Saints* defense at all.. this could end up being a shoot out in all honesty. They are allergic to stopping the run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bucs running allowed them to control the clock..and that's essentially what you look for when you run the ball.

I don't trust the Saints*** defense at all.. this could end up being a shoot out in all honesty. They are allergic to stopping the run

their defense and the fact that the panthers couldn't stay on the field had more to do with that. all they did with the ball is not drop it.

agreed about the Saints** D, tho. very well could be a shoot out...unless the panthers D from last week shows up. i think they can handle what the Saints** showed on the field last sunday. the panthers problems with their offense is easier fixed than the Saints* problems on defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So he says TE's are equal and nobody's up in arms?

Equal in the sense that there isn't a liability there.. That's how I rank the positions by identifying the liabilities.. Which is why last week everyone was up in arms about being equal at QB with the Bucs.. Wasn't saying Freeman is better than Cam, just pointing out the Bucs didn't have Chris Chandler at QB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one thing that scares me- Jimmy Graham. How do we game plan for him? Keek + big nickel help? I wouldn't mind seeing Martin, Haruki, and Godfrey lined up on a few plays. Graham is really the X-factor here. Fortunately for us, Brees is not gelling 100% yet with this WR core yet. I heard chico the other day on sirius nfl radio, and he was talking about gearing up for the Saints*. Pat Kirwan mentioned a previous game a couple years back of a team coming out of the gates slow (with high expectations), and then captured the second win against a good team (can't remember who). Rivera said he remembers watching that game- "that game gives us hope." Kirwan and Tim Ryan were caught off guard big time. What head coach needs HOPE to win the second game of the season. I love Rivera so far, but that scared me! Can't wait til Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Equal in the sense that there isn't a liability there.. That's how I rank the positions by identifying the liabilities.. Which is why last week everyone was up in arms about being equal at QB with the Bucs.. Wasn't saying Freeman is better than Cam, just pointing out the Bucs didn't have Chris Chandler at QB

Theres more of a liability on our defense to contain Graham than their is for them to contain Olsen.

Also, Receivers I actually think we have them beat

Smith, Lafell,Muprhy> Colston, Moore, Henderson.

People seem to forget that Murphy was the #1 in Oakland until he got hurt/started bitching about them benching Jason Campbell losing his job to Palmer.

Murphy's good receiver and has proven such so far with us. Lafell is super clutch and really starting to come into his own now that he's got a QB and grasp the playbook. Then of course Steve Smith is Steve Smith.

Our top 3 "WR'S" just based off one week caught 61% of the passes thrown at them for 234 yards and only 1 drop over 21 targets.

Their top 3 "WR'S" week one only caught 50% of the passes thrown at them for 202 yards and had 3 drops over 22 targets.

You also mentioned Gamble and Colston being a good matchup to watch, which I agree with but it seems to me N.O likes to put him in the slot a lot and Gamble stays on the outside every down, so I don't know how much we will those 2 face off. If and when they do, I have full confidence in Gamble containing him at the very least.

All that being said it will be very interesting to see what happens this week, as the biggest similarity in each of our losses last week was be both got dominated on the time of possesion. Washington had the ball just under 19 minutes longer than the Saints* and the Bucs held onto it almost a full 15 minutes longer than us. On top of that we both lost the turnover battle 0-2 in favor of our opponents. And the final similar aspect which you did mention was how we both abadoned the run game quickly,they only gave their backs 10 carries, and us 7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
    • Totally agree with you, if we had invested in drafting a corner or two I wouldn’t even ponder adding Ramsey. But, to be honest we legit added nobody to our corner room this offseason we have nobody worth developing. Even if Chau Smith Wade is better then what I think, he is the only guy we have invested draft capital into outside of our starters.
    • Look at his snap counts, your telling me that his entire college and pro football career every coach he has had has misused him? No offense but I don’t think you understand the role of a slot corner. Mike Jackson is the literal definition of an outside zone corner, he would be totally inept as a slot corner. Ala why he has been an outside corner his entire career.
×
×
  • Create New...