Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bill Romanowski says it best

philw5289

By philw5289,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

Alright: realistically here are our next four games

Seattle (home)- Seattle's defense is stout- but outside of Marshawn Lynch their offense is not that great- if we play anything like we did against the Falcons we should have this one- Win

Bye week

Cowboys (home)- I'm giving us a win. We'll have a week to prepare for the Cowboys, who quite frankly, are pretty average.

Bears (away)- Coming off two wins, can the Panthers sustain? Depends on two things: One is Matt Forte. This guy destroyed us last year by himself. Two: jay Cutler- this guy has a tendency to poo himself, when pressure is applied. D-line will be huge this game. Loss

Redskins (away)- RGIII looks great so far, then again there isn't much tape on him. Give us time to watch his tendencies, and I bet you he slows down. Defensively, the Redskins are underrated. Front seven is pretty stout, going to have to air it out against them. I think this and the Cowboys will be our closest games. However, I'm predicting a loss here.

So 2-2.....however, our last eight games are vastly easier. Toughest game from there is the Eagles away and the Falcons at home. Week 17 will be an automatic W, because I guarantee the Saints have shut it down by then.

I honestly think we could go 7-1 in our last eight. Leaving us at 10-6. However, I wouldn't be surprised if we end up at 7-9 either. All depends on which Panther team shows up: the Giants or the Falcons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      I agree, but I've already said that the players will definitely take more money up front because it's more security. But they want more guaranteed money and NFL FOs don't want to do that for several and various reasons, and that's what's at issue.  https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-second-round-rookies-finally-starting-to-sign-what-took-so-long-and-what-it-means-for-future-contracts/ It's a tug of war between teams and players, and, sure, paying a player a signing bonus may satisfy them, especially if--and sometimes "only if"--it ultimately leads to a guarantee of more of their contract, but the teams are on the hook for all of those guarantees when cap time comes, so if they guarantee more money, they're ultimately losing the contract game.
    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
×
×
  • Create New...