Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Shock meant all that, then why not Winslow? Discussion


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I read somewhere recently here about how the loss of Shockey has been a deceptively profound part in the team's/Cam's demise on offense. Now, I am not saying whether I believe this is true or not, but if it is true then it would seem like Winslow could feel that void in spades. In my opinion, we need to run decidedly more two TE sets, and if Barnidge is not the answer (which is arguable), then Winslow would actually provide another talented, receiving TE who would give Cam another viable target, and opposing defenses fits. Winslow left the Pats because he wanted to be a bigger part of the offense. He wanted to play. Why not play him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

something is obviously wrong with Winslow. there is a reason 3 or 4 teams cut him this year already.

I am not sure that he was cut by that many. I thought it was only the Seahawks that really cut him, and from what I read, that is because they thought that a younger, cheaper Evan Moore could fulfill their needs. By most accounts, the Seattle "experts" were shocked that Winslow was cut, especially considering his success during TC. The Pats cut him because Winslow requested to be cut because he wanted a bigger role in the offense. You know he wasn't going to get playing time behind Hernandez and Gronk and company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bum knee

Patriots released TE Kellen Winslow.

Winslow reportedly asked for the release. Less than a week after signing, the 29-year-old played (four snaps) behind Michael Hoomanawanui and Daniel Fells as the fourth tight end at Baltimore. The Boston Globe's "educated guess" is that Winslow's troublesome knee was in "a lot of pain" this week. That would come as no surprise after early-September reports that he failed a physical. Winslow could opt to take the rest of the season off and try for a comeback in 2013.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best TE in draft! FA pickups for dt and safety.

We already got a safety FA. To me, it makes more sense to draft a safety and pcik up a TE in FA. That being said, I don't see any better TE available. Shock obviously doesn't want to play for us (if at all anymore). And, waiting for the draft is not going to help us THIS YEAR. I realize some have given up on the year, but we still need to strive for development and improvement if nothing else. If Winslow doesn't (or won't) fiit, or is just a low-priced fill-in, then he can easily be released after the year.

A young, developing Graham-like TE would be great, but where is he? We got Barnidge, right...? Anyway, I say draft a safety first, then worry about a TE later, if it comes to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bc both Shock and Winslow are not going to change our College Read Option System to a Pro Style system.

I get what you're saying, and I feel your pain, but we will adjust. We have to.

Kurb, Olsen is pretty good, and that's why I could easily see two-TE sets with Olsen and Winslow, much like Gronk and Hernandez.

Don't any of you ask yourselves why the evil genius would actually sign Winslow? It's got nothing to do with a bum Knee. Bill ain't stupid He is arguably the best there is. He signed him because there is something there. If it's good enough for Bill, then perhaps we should give Winslow a serious look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't any of you ask yourselves why the evil genius would actually sign Winslow? It's got nothing to do with a bum Knee. Bill ain't stupid He is arguably the best there is. He signed him because there is something there. If it's good enough for Bill, then perhaps we should give Winslow a serious look.

According to SI.com's Peter King, "smart people" knew Kellen Winslow and Patriots coach Bill Belichick "would never be a fit."

King hears from a source that Belichick inquired about Winslow during the offseason only to be told by good friend Greg Schiano, in effect, "You do not want this guy." Winslow had previously said he "had to roll" out of Tampa because he didn't like Schiano's "toes on the line!" approach. It's no surprise that he lasted just a week with Belichick.Sep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...