Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Few updates for this Sunday


1989

Recommended Posts

I'm all for Gettis being activated, but some of you act like he'll be like Cruz. He is beyond rusty, we have no clue if his decent rookie effort was a fluke of not (hi, Keary Colbert!), and he has very little chemistry with Cam and Chud yet. Bring him back slowly so he shines late and is a factor next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for Gettis being activated, but some of you act like he'll be like Cruz. He is beyond rusty, we have no clue if his decent rookie effort was a fluke of not (hi, Keary Colbert!), and he has very little chemistry with Cam and Chud yet. Bring him back slowly so he shines late and is a factor next season.

I think people are excited because he has all the tools. Great size, hands, speed. He could really add something to our offense and people are just excited about what he could add to our offense. It would just be nice to see what he can give us because his rookie season he was one of the only positive things from that year. Nobody has said rush him back. If we brought him back any slower than we already are we'd get passed by a snail. He and others admitted he probably could have started the season active but they just decided they were fine with the receivers we had and there was no since in bringing him back. People are allowed to be excited and anxious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...