Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do we need to acquire a running back in the offseason


panthers04100

Recommended Posts

Deangelo probably being gone and Stewart hasn't done jack poo this season an Tolbert is useless. I hate to say this with all the money we've spent on running backs I think we need to acquire someone to share some carries with Stewart next seasons.

Tauren Poole and Armond Smith could be the depth we need if Dwill goes.

In the link above the OP mentioned that LaFell said Armond Smith was one of the fastest players on the team.

So I think we could have depth at RB if needed. We just need a Oline that could open up holes for them to get through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not trying to be funny, but the problem with our run game pretty much falls squarely on questionable play calling in my opinion. Neither back gets the ball enough to really get into the flow of the game and run away with it. Moreover, as has been mentioned, we have guys that appear to have some surprisingly good upside on the practice squad. If not this year because of Crud, err Chud, our running game will flourish once again next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell, I'd argue we have TOO MANY RBs at this point for what we're trying to do (or, at least, too much money tied up in them). Tolbert is useless, save for some screens/run blocking from the FB position and the occasional goal line run. However, Stew can do the goal line running. Williams hasn't really done ANYTHING except for catching the pitch on the edge. Not really his fault, he and Stew are both struggling due to the OL. However, moving forward, either Williams has to restructure or he has to go. We need cap space and he is taking a HUGE chunk of it and he's not playing worth the money we're paying him (again, may not be his fault due to the OL, but it is truth either way).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think evaluating QBs making the transition to the NFL is just a lot harder and more nuanced than draftniks make it out to be. That and the rookie wage scale means that if you don't have a franchise QB on the roster and you think this guy might be one you're almost forced to draft him now that you're protected from giving that guy a future HOFer type contract before he ever plays an NFL down. The expectation for mist of these guys to play right away is also not helping IMO.
    • Plenty of good teams made it to Super Bowls and some even won with meh QBs. Takes solid defense, good offensive planning and play calling and a helluva lot of magic. And I think the great QB elevating a team thing is overplayed too much. History just doesn't bear it out. Sure, it can lift a moderately good team like Mahomes did with the Chiefs, or Hurts did with the Eagles. And one can argue about Brady and the Pats (or even Bucs) but if you look at those Patriot and Buccaneer teams... there was something very solid in place already.  Heck, the whole idea that a single player can make or break an NFL team is vastly overplayed. The Cowboys have had a roster full of "star" players for decades now and have gotten bupkus in return. The Raiders have chased everything they could and have floundered mightily. The Giants have had star after star and nothing.  It's just hard to sell posters of a team. Give the marketing people a star though...
    • Seems you found the "exception" to the OP. Eli wasn't actually drafted by the Giants. But that's the only team he ever played for since he refused to go to San Diego. 
×
×
  • Create New...