Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The point of playing musical chairs with the RG spot?


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Pick one and go, I saw Bridges, Byers AND Williams at RG last Sunday, this is ridiculous, offensive lines need to mold, they have to be on the same page with each-other in order to move in unison. Taking one out and putting another in is just dumb, and another example of Rivera's terrible coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He couldn't get in shape and he alleged couldn't learn the offense.

when he was in, cam had more time in the pocket and DeAngelo was running better. I don't understand how much there was to learn. Just line up and block your guy. Which he did. And obviously he was in good enough shape to get in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pick one and go, I saw Bridges, Byers AND Williams at RG last Sunday, this is ridiculous, offensive lines need to mold, they have to be on the same page with each-other in order to move in unison. Taking one out and putting another in is just dumb, and another example of Rivera's terrible coaching.

If we are changing Olineman during a game (not caused by injury) there is a reason..........

and it's not terrible coaching.

BTW.......remember our starting RG is playing C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pick one and go, I saw Bridges, Byers AND Williams at RG last Sunday, this is ridiculous, offensive lines need to mold, they have to be on the same page with each-other in order to move in unison. Taking one out and putting another in is just dumb, and another example of Rivera's terrible coaching.

There are like 4 games left with a lame duck staff. They are seeing what players are worth a crap for the future. This season has been toast for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The best part is they compliment each other. Chuba is a more patient runner, patiently waiting for gaps to form while Rico is more explosive. I wish they would use Rico more like McCaffery was used - getting him the ball in space to take advantage of his explosivness and violence. Then have Chuba pound the middle for the tough yards.
    • I loved those late 90s-early 2000s Miami teams.  If McGahee hadn’t had that injury, he would probably have been a Top 10 all-time rusher, no doubt in my mind.  The fact he didn’t lose his leg below the knee is still a miracle.  And the fact he came back from that, made it in the NFL, and still carved out a career that included over 8k yards rushing and two pro bowls is damn impressive.  It just demonstrates how good he would have been had he never had the injury.  Prior to that, he was like nothing I had ever seen.  Like a bigger, more physical and elusive Reggie Bush.
    • Boozer may end up going higher in the draft, but agree about Caleb Wilson. Give me that dude, think he's going to translate very well and has the attitude I want on a young team.  My perfect world as of now... Trade anything not bolted down as far as vet's go. Sexton is on an expiring and would be an easy flip. Bridges, just get him somewhere else. One year left on a low $20 mil deal should be an easy trade...but the apron for many teams could haunt us.  LaMelo is the issue. Likely would have to trade our problem to someone else for their problem (Ja, Zion, Zach Lavine) to make contracts somewhat match up.  I want to build around last year's draft class, get as many bites at this draft class as possible, etc. If we get lucky and get #1 or #2, wonderful. If not, get into the top 5 or so and grab Caleb Wilson. 
×
×
  • Create New...