Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where we pick in the draft scenarios is good or REALLY good


SIGCHI222

Recommended Posts

From what I can gather, if we win next Sunday against NO, and the Bucs, Jets, Browns, Jags, Eagles, Dolphins, Chiefs, Raiders and Cardinals loose, we get the 10th overall pick.

But if we loose and the Bucs, Jets, Browns, Saints, Rams and Dolphins win, we get the 4th overall pick.

I realize something in-between will happen. I hope we can draft a DT, O-lineman or secondary personnel that can compliment Cam and Kuechly.

What say you Huddle? Finish the season with a flurry, save Chico's job and roll the dice in 2013 with a Rivera lead team that has a top 10 rookie coming in or change horses and see what we can do with a top 4 pick?

Is there that much difference between a 4th and 10th player selected? Kuechly went 9th, anybody want to switch him for Matt Kalil (sorry Ryan)?

Just win baby, 2013 will be the year.

Black cats and 13 go together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the hype with Hankins, a few people have busted his ass for taking plays off.

This might be 100% pure speculation but I assume that anyone against Hankins must be a complete homesexual

Now now, it's possible that everyone has a difference of opinion and that everyone's opinion is valid

Although it is more than likely that these people are just blind haters consumed with their phallic obsession

Yeah you probably just hate Hankins cause you love the cack, just admit it

Don't lie, you've got a whole ghey buttsxe thing planned on for the whole evening and are just killing time on a message board until the first wave of "bros" stop by

Whatever you've got going on, it's cool. No judgement. I'm sure I've seen pictures of even worse across the internet. Well... maybe not.... but just don't show me what you've been doing. It's cool bro, just do that whole... uhh.. thing... you got going on... Anyway, vote Hankins for 2013.... unless you're into ghey gangrape buttshex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might be 100% pure speculation but I assume that anyone against Hankins must be a complete homesexual

Now now, it's possible that everyone has a difference of opinion and that everyone's opinion is valid

Although it is more than likely that these people are just blind haters consumed with their phallic obsession

Yeah you probably just hate Hankins cause you love the cack, just admit it

Don't lie, you've got a whole ghey buttsxe thing planned on for the whole evening and are just killing time on a message board until the first wave of "bros" stop by

Whatever you've got going on, it's cool. No judgement. I'm sure I've seen pictures of even worse across the internet. Well... maybe not.... but just don't show me what you've been doing. It's cool bro, just do that whole... uhh.. thing... you got going on... Anyway, vote Hankins for 2013.... unless you're into ghey gangrape buttshex

Lol the CBS Scout department was one of them...

Great post though ha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ohhhhhhhhhh!! CBS scouting department...... what a reputable source i shall forever bow beneath

oohhhh i am forever humbled by the glorious achievements of the CBS NFL scouting department....... AKA CBS NCAA scouting department...... AKA kids Saturday fun time TV leadership development counsel

you kids stay in shape now! play 60 a day! every day!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The recent hits on Hankins are the same thing that gets said about just about every DT that comes out. He was borderline dominant in the beginning of the season, didn't maintain that level of play (though I read somewhere late he picked it back up) and now people say that's a result of lack of motivation or whatever. Couldn't possibly be that offenses saw what he was doing early and started compensating to defend against him. Couldn't be that almost no one maintains a level of dominance like that over the stretch of a whole season.

Who knows, maybe he really does have motivation issues, but any time I read that a DT has motivation issues because they didn't maintain an early surge I pretty much disregard it. DT is one of the toughest (if not THE toughest), most physical positions in football and very very few guys dominant from first whistle on opening day to final whistle on the season ender. As of now, before the combine and before the more detailed scouting videos come out on youtube (the best most of us have to go off of), Hankins is my guy if Star is gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The recent hits on Hankins are the same thing that gets said about just about every DT that comes out. He was borderline dominant in the beginning of the season, didn't maintain that level of play (though I read somewhere late he picked it back up) and now people say that's a result of lack of motivation or whatever. Couldn't possibly be that offenses saw what he was doing early and started compensating to defend against him. Couldn't be that almost no one maintains a level of dominance like that over the stretch of a whole season.

Who knows, maybe he really does have motivation issues, but any time I read that a DT has motivation issues because they didn't maintain an early surge I pretty much disregard it. DT is one of the toughest (if not THE toughest), most physical positions in football and very very few guys dominant from first whistle on opening day to final whistle on the season ender. As of now, before the combine and before the more detailed scouting videos come out on youtube (the best most of us have to go off of), Hankins is my guy if Star is gone.

Why do we need DT in the first again? Don't we do this every year? It was Marcell Darreus in 2011, then it was Fletcher Cox last year, now were back with this year with a DT that won't help us whatsoever for the next 2 to 3 years anymore than Dwan and Ron edwards will. Look at Fletcher Cox's stats, Dwan Edwards has better stats than him if you don't count the weeks Dwan missed with injury.

Let's get an impact position in the draft, Offensive Tackle is something we need and its hard to miss and its instant impact. DT have the same bust rate as QB's, we don't need to waste a first round pick on a player than won't contribute in a major way for the next 2 to 3 years.

I say draft OT in the first, or my teammate from high school Jonathan Cooper (shameless namedrop) who is rated around where we will pick as an OG and keep Bell on the outside with Hangartner as depth. Then get a Safety in the 2nd. Finally get a WR in free agency and were good to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...