Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Discover BCS National Championship


carolina-chuck

Recommended Posts

I really do worry about Warmack's mobility. Really doesnt matter. Should never take a OG that high anyways. Decastro was the better Guard prospect by miles last year and didnt go until the mid twenties.

I've been preaching that for months but if Warmack is the BPA at 14 and can boost your OLINE up, go with him. Don't go with what history tells you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a Guard is never the BPA. Because anyone who knows what BPA really means knows positional value plays a part. If Marty Hurney understood that perhaps he'd still be employed in this sport.

Warmack is a beast at 14 though. Who would you take ahead of Warmack at 14 other than my guys (Hankins, Allen, Jesse and Richardson); your BPA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Jesse Williams solidifies that he is worthy of the 14th pick in the combine I'd get on board with him as well. I just want a big DT that constantly draws the double team and has an endless motor.

I just love his nastiness. Love the attitude and his crazy tattoos and his style. The dude has "Fear is a Liar" tattooed on his head. Our defense needs more freaks up front and some mean dudes to get after wittle Matty Ice and Brees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know some people see taking OG at 14 as bad value due to the position, but this guy is really an instant starter can't miss prospect. I can't say the same about Hankins, Richardson, Jesse Williams, Eric Reid. Maybe Keenan Allen is a sure fire superstar, but that's about it. Call me Marty Hurney if you would like but I will take the safe pick in round 1 every time. Reach later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...