Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3-4 Look For Carolina? Quoted from ESPN Insider


Russian Bear

Recommended Posts

walterfootball is mocking him at like #17. they're claiming that scouts think he's going to flop at the combine and fall into the mid first.

i mean if we want a pass rusher that can pretty much line up anywhere...

Man I hope he isn't there when we pick. We don't need a LB but you have to take him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it that everyone is saying Beason will be gone after this season? He has ZERO trade value, whats worse then a linebacker with knee problems, one with shoulder problems 0 for 2. No team will pick up the cap hit required in a trade. The cap hit we would take to release him is not gonna happen. He would have to have a great season to up his stock for next year. Best case he restructures with an incentive based contract like Davis and we move on. As for Beason playing outside linebacker he was drafted at that position, Dan Morgan still was here in 07. May not be as natural as it was before, but he can play there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet another person who thinks you can just plug any random 4 linebackers into a 3-4 as long as they're "starting caliber."

Was expecting Bleacher Report, turned out to be ESPN. Same level of research I guess.

I didn't know people on Bleacher report did interviews with teams Defensive coordinators....

I swear people don't read, the article and everything in it was from the Panther's DC.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you disguised the website, you could use bleacher report and ESPN atricles interchangeably.

You're right tho, 3-4 OLBs are guys like Ware, Suggs, and Aldon Smith. Not Jon Beason.

Beason, if healthy can be a great 34 MLB (Patrick Willis). If we're moving into a 34 with what we have, Anderson and TD are OLB. And the answer for that question: they're still not 34 OLBs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone wanna take a look at a BR MOCK, here it is:

http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/1512696-2013-nfl-mock-draft-predicting-all-7-rounds-after-the-super-bowl/page/15

1: Jarvis Jones OLB

2: Quinton Patton WR

4: Jordan Hill DT

5: Rick Wagner OT

6: Gerald Hodges OLB

7: Manase Foketi OT

I'll have to say, it ain't that bad. Pretty good mock and I can live with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...