Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL sirius just reported that the 49ers are not going to pursue Revis at the present time.


panthers55

Recommended Posts

I don't know who tweeted them, but the latest is that San Fran is not interested in pursuing Revis at this time. They may have tried to work it out and but got nowhere which is why they traded Smith to KC instead of trying to trade him and perhaps another pick to the Jets for Revis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revis is more trouble than he's worth. Coming off an ACL he's in no position to holdout and the Jets being tight against the cap with a lame duck QB are in no position to demand a 1st or multiple 1st's for a guy with a year left on his contract. I'm sure the Patriots would be happy to take Revis off their hands though. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade down with SF for both their 2nd rounders. Have possession of 34, 44, and 61.

(Reid, Rogers, Jesse)

Trading down for their 1st and #34 would be a lot more realistic. I wouldn't be happy with their two 2nds for our 1st. Our 1st for their 1st and #34 would be 60 points in their favor, so we could probably toss in our 4th or 5th to even it out. I'd be very happy with our 1st and 4th or 5th for their 1st and #34.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading down for their 1st and #34 would be a lot more realistic. I wouldn't be happy with their two 2nds for our 1st. Our 1st for their 1st and #34 would be 60 points in their favor, so we could probably toss in our 4th or 5th to even it out. I'd be very happy with our 1st and 4th or 5th for their 1st and #34.

True. I'd be happy if we get 3picks in the first 2rds. Or even in the first 3rds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...