Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Favorite Muscle Car


stirs

Recommended Posts

Yeah. Plenty of room for some ladies and gear for a day out at the beach, park, tailgating, etc.

I have one... A 65 convertible with a small block in it... Not in great shape though... It was my grandads... Bone stock... Gonna keep it original as much as i can. A project for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Mr. Shelby:

1966_ford_gt40-pic-29448.jpeg

And 80s muscle car is an oxymoron. I love Mustangs. Own one. But the Fox body style rapes your eyes.

Well if you're gonna go Shelby....

1967_shelby_cobra-pic-30251.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Calling this a muscle car is an insult. This was ferrari killer. Supercar.

An insult to Muscle Cars. That's much more aptly labeled a 2+2 GT, a totally different design philosophy.

Lots of beautiful American automobiles in this thread that dont even come close to the Muscle Car label.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have one... A 65 convertible with a small block in it... Not in great shape though... It was my grandads... Bone stock... Gonna keep it original as much as i can. A project for the future.

lucky you. I'd love to do one of those big cars. Bel Airs, Impalas, and early Chevelle/Malibu/GTO are all great cars with plenty of muscle for me, and plenty of room for whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An insult to Muscle Cars. That's much more aptly labeled a 2+2 GT, a totally different design philosophy.

Lots of beautiful American automobiles in this thread that dont even come close to the Muscle Car label.

I know what a muscle car is and calling a GT40 a muscle car is a slap in the face. We need to change the thread to car porn. That'll settle it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly.  You let him play out next season and continue to develop Thorton.  Jackson’s earned his next contract, but his age and the risk of tying up such a large portion of the payroll at one position leads me to believe that we’ll let him walk. In all likelihood, we’ll draft another CB, or two, and bring in some journeymen to fill the roster void, between now and the start of the 2027 season.  That’ll create more balance financially across the roster enabling us to invest in other areas.  
    • As far as the NFCS … I think this division will be hotly contested the next couple of years.   I am tending to pay more respect to both Atlanta and the Saints n terms of how strong they will be moving forward, than not.    I am mixed on Ryan but think they have a decent roster to start with. I don’t think he blundered hiring Stefanski. And that offense can be dangerous with a QB. Plus, defense is arrow up. No 1st round pick, WB issues will dull their effectiveness. Question is, to what degree?   I think Moore is going to be a good HC and can overcome tape that people have on Shough. They need a lot but they were playing with people. Just the way you want to see all the way to the end.    Not sure about Tampa they have Mayfield but I don’t think they can maintain their success and Bowles is not going to last much longer. They have to go through all that. Gonna be tough once it starts. Might already have started.    For us I feel pretty good about Morgan. But less so about our offense, we have some short term RB and OL issues and those things are critical given what we are working with at QB.  Overall, mixed. Like a lot of what I see but some major question marks remain.     
    • Absolutely. If we are talking about a 20 year old youngster. He's a grown-ass man, and he doesn't know what his job entails or how to do it? Maybe he will be better next year! It's the Panther way.
×
×
  • Create New...