Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

you should see spring breakers


Recommended Posts

I saw "Rock of Ages" for the first time this weekend (HBO free preview).

The part of the film that seems to stay uppermost in my mind was when they had Julianne Hough pole dancing :blink:

I pondered afterward if that scene might have been the whole reason the film was made.

If true, whether I'd call that a positive or a negative...I think I'll withhold comment :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got kind of a "grouchy old man" thing about younger actresses / celebrities.

(if I'm being honest, I've got "grouchy old man" thoughts on a lot of topics) :(

If they were over 18 the first time I ever saw them, the difference in age doesn't bother me quite as much (though it's true these days that most of my 'big attractions' tend to be women in their 30s or higher). If I first became acquainted with them when they were child stars though, I have a tough time shifting focus and thinking of them as adults.

Don't know. Maybe for most guys that's not an issue, and I likely have exceptions, but this generally holds true for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OL then RB would make heads explode but its might not be too unlikely 
    • Wonder if we draft a RB. Seems like a lot of eggs in Brooks’ basket right now.  And the OL, no kidding. If that running game goes to hell with what we have at QB, you can forget competing. It is so much more important than sticking another wideout on the field. Take your wideout later. 
    • I have lots of different thoughts on it. This argument, the primary thing is I don’t like seeing him or anyone, being convicted on hearsay and/or pure speculation. Which some are doing.  I don’t care That much about defending Morgan as I do about the criticism being fair minded.    You sort of assert that Dan was just a yes man. I don’t think we know if he ever pushed back against Fitterer but I have this instinct thing that needs me to satisfy the question of: if Tepper was so down on a Fitterer as to fire him, why in the world would he hire his carbon copy? I guess maybe he wanted a yes man.Like I said, lots of different thoughts.     I am just not gonna judge him that harshly based only on speculation. I am sticking with what he has done starting when he was hired as GM. Maybe I am more lenient because the first season for him and Canales, I gave both a pass. Said I would judge them after the first year. Stuck to it. If you can get to the reality that neither were ready for the job and say okay give them a year get their feet wet, it looks a lot better.    And we are not bound to Bryce yet. Yes, for yet another fuging year he can probably marginally improve and slide by like he has been doing. But if they add even more people and he regresses? I think we could see some relief.    The QB room? As I understand it, Pickett was Canales’ choice. If we need to blame people for poo. In a sense, he is very Bryce like. So makes a good plug in. I get that a little bit. We still have the draft. If they do better than Jake Plummer or Hooker I’ll know they are trying.   
×
×
  • Create New...