Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Full 32 team mock


toldozer

Recommended Posts

Im doing a mock as the panthers, i have already traded down from 14 to 21

For picks 84 & 156

Also gave pick 184.

Should i stay put or try and trade down again

Its at pick 18 now

Cyprien, slyvester williams, richardson, hopkins, austin, allen, hunter are all still on the board atm. Which would take or do you have a better suggestion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get why you HAVE to take Austin. Sure he's a weapon, but is he a can't miss definite number one Wide Receiver? I have my doubts on that. I see Austin as more of a luxury pick because he doesn't have a true position, just a chess piece you can move around. Just my two pennies....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just think he has really good value at 21...can't really pass up explosive, game changing players. There were people who didn't want Cam, but you can't pass up that kind of unique talent. In Austin's case there isn't another offensive player like him in the draft. I feel like thats well worth the 21st pick...or the 14th for that matter. I like Cyprien, Allen, and Williams but Austin is a dynamic player that could take our offense to a whole new level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just think he has really good value at 21...can't really pass up explosive, game changing players. There were people who didn't want Cam, but you can't pass up that kind of unique talent. In Austin's case there isn't another offensive player like him in the draft. I feel like thats well worth the 21st pick...or the 14th for that matter. I like Cyprien, Allen, and Williams but Austin is a dynamic player that could take our offense to a whole new level.

I would argue there's several that could be used in very similar ways....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get why you HAVE to take Austin. Sure he's a weapon, but is he a can't miss definite number one Wide Receiver? I have my doubts on that. I see Austin as more of a luxury pick because he doesn't have a true position, just a chess piece you can move around. Just my two pennies....

But he's more a Harvin chess piece, not McCluster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he's more a Harvin chess piece, not McCluster.

I agree, but if we're taking a wide receiver in the first I want it to be a guy who can be a number one. Don't get me wrong, I love Austin and if we had a young number one already established I would be all over bringing him in as a toy for Shula to move around. I just don't think he's the best available "WR", and I think you can get similar toys later in the draft. A guy I've seen mentioned on here a few times and I really like a lot is Onterio McCalebb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have an offer to trade 21 for 38 & 56

That would put me at 3 second round picks, 1 3rd, 1 4th, two fifths. Ideally unless a better player were to fall.

Larry warford -og

Slay - cb

Rambo - safety

Da'Rick Rodgers - wr

Montori Hughes - dt

And then two fifth round picks. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're set on those positions in that order I would switch Rambo with Swearinger. However I would go with S (maybe Cyprien still there, or Elam) or WR (Allen/Hopkins/Hunter/Woods) with the 38th pick. Then I would stick with Slay at 44 and see if a guy like Kyle Long is at 56 (can play LG and be the future at LT and you just move Amini to RG). Then I would go with B Williams over Rogers, and then in the fourth fill whichever of S/WR you didn't in the second, or there could be insane value sitting there (D.J. Hayden maybe)...again, just my two pennies....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure where you are with the Draft but three 2nds would be fine...Jessie Williams if he's there, Da'rick rodgers would be a great pick, and it's a good place to ****** a corner or offensive linemen. Here's what I'd be thinking

DT: Williams, Short, Hankins

WR: Rodgers, Bailey, Hunter, Woods

CB: Slay, Taylor

OL: Dallas Thomas, Warford, Pugh

S: Swearinger, Elam

A lot of talent in the second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...