Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our arch rival wants to trade up


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Wha? No way the failcons have 11 picks.

Edit: OK so they do have 11 picks, but 4 of those are 7th rounders -

Number of Selections: 11 (1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7)

they have 7 tradeable picks and 4 comp picks.

basically their practice squad is going to be LOADED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either they see something they want that wont be there when they pick or they just have enough picks to move around. Either way the Panthers have so many needs that we can afford to drop back collect some picks for this year and next and still get some of the guys we want at better value. Don't like dealing with the feathered fags but sometimes when the music is on you just have to dance with the devil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would expect the Failcons to target either a CB (Milliner/Rhodes) or an OT (Fisher/Johnson/Fluker).

good call. LT. they just released clabo.

funny thing, i just look and they are only around $1.7mil under the cap (maybe$2mil depending on where you look).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either they see something they want that wont be there when they pick or they just have enough picks to move around. Either way the Panthers have so many needs that we can afford to drop back collect some picks for this year and next and still get some of the guys we want at better value. Don't like dealing with the feathered fags but sometimes when the music is on you just have to dance with the devil.

Sometimes when the poo nanny presents itself, you just gotta pop it. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sound write-up MHS, as always.  Agree that the smart move that forward thinking franchises make would be drafting a tackle early, if not for sure in R1, depending on who's there. Based on early predictions we're choosing between Fano and Proctor. No brainer here...Fano all day. Proctor does not move the needle for me. In my mind, Icky has less future here than Brooks does. I love Icky, but he has been average as a top-10 pick, one good year where you saw the potential...and that was this year. He's built like a RT and his strengths are there, but he's always played left. I also feel like part of what has held him back from being elite, was his work ethic. He was known for it coming out, but feel like he fell right at home in Carolina and maybe didn't push himself as hard as he needed to. Throw in a major crucial injury that will take time to recover and a historical low return rate to current form, and the outlook is not great. Fano can play both sides and we need to also plan for Moton's departure. Either way, delaying drafting a tackle early this year will hurt us down the line. Our current OL is overpriced and needs to start adding draftees to start balancing out the inevitable changes coming in the next 2-3 years.  As others have said, maybe Icky can replace Hunt or Lewis in a couple years when he's fully recovered....IDK. Also not a guarantee, but then you have to figure out his contract and it becomes even more clouded.
    • It's past time to just eliminate it in terms of an event. Just do the voting, name the roster, and move on. When you get down to 6th and 7th alternates it's just absurd. It doesn't mean anything.
    • Give me Blake on the 3rd  
×
×
  • Create New...