Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What if we traded our 1st for....


Recommended Posts

And next year you'll ask "what if we trade the pick we got from last year for next year's..." Some people don't have the balls to handle having a first round pick without wanting to trade out of it, and I'm glad our GM isn't one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every one is cool with trading down and getting a lower first round and a third. Take their second and third this year if you want an additional pick along with 2014 #1 pick.

I am not normally for trading our 1st away but this draft IMO is weak.

I don't think we will because we have so few picks this year anyhow. That said, I wouldn't be pissed if we did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since i'm still not allowed to post and this is something that needs posting, the Vikings are looking to trade up for Tavon. They have a #23 and #25. I want this to happen more than anything. We could take Xavier Rhodes and not reach for a safety. Grab BPA DT/WR in 2nd. i hope to god this happens.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-on-football/22105655/report-vikings-could-trade-up-to-select-receiver-in-round-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not an option I'd consider unless we are getting a better deal than that. The least I'd want is a 2nd and a 3rd in 2013, and perhaps a mid round pick in 2014. But I'd rather us either draft a guy with our first this year, or trade down and have a late first round pick. I agree with Rodeo, you've got to have the balls to make a pick in the first, and trading out shouldn't be under consideration unless we're landing a proven pro bowl type player in exchange (though our cap would probably prevent us trading it for a player).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not an option I'd consider unless we are getting a better deal than that. The least I'd want is a 2nd and a 3rd in 2013, and perhaps a mid round pick in 2014. But I'd rather us either draft a guy with our first this year, or trade down and have a late first round pick. I agree with Rodeo, you've got to have the balls to make a pick in the first, and trading out shouldn't be under consideration unless we're landing a proven pro bowl type player in exchange (though our cap would probably prevent us trading it for a player).

You wouldn't want the #23 and #25 pick? I say if they throw in their third this year then yeah def.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since i'm still not allowed to post and this is something that needs posting, the Vikings are looking to trade up for Tavon. They have a #23 and #25. I want this to happen more than anything. We could take Xavier Rhodes and not reach for a safety. Grab BPA DT/WR in 2nd. i hope to god this happens.

http://www.cbssports...iver-in-round-1

This would be a dream scenario if this actually happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We do, that's why i'm hoping this happens. We could really help shore up our secondary or just holes on defense if this happens.

I think we'd be better served by taking the BPA with our 1st, 2nd, 3rd and so forth. I fail to see the benefit of trading away the 14th pick for an additional 2nd.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Steelers fans will take over the Stadium and city   It will be unbearable  worse for me, on the west coast, resigned to the nfl network and you know it will be a steelers broadcast team.    It was ungodly bad with sheduer 2 weeks ago  Last game, tried listening  on panthers radio and  watching  on espn live last week but the delay between the 2 drove me nuts  so as bad as they were playing, found something else to do 
    • I mean I don't have a personal axe to grind with any human on the Panthers roster.  I know AT shouldn't be dominating the slot. The fact he is....is because we have a horrific front office/management.   I can part with any player.   The goal is a winning team.   the root of the AT ranting, is really just looking out for BY (people like to call me BY hater though).  A QB who was basically screwed from day 1 when we got drafted here.  I went hard at Carolina then too for setting him up to fail. Because it was obvious from the jump the setup was failure by design.  Which was true.   I said Frank bad zero sense with BY.  Miles Sandes made double zero sense.  The players they got in FA made zero sense.     Either you build a BY O.....or you move on from BY.  I have said I am cool either way.  We are in no man's land and have been there since they day we drafted him.   
    • It's the QB school guy mentality. Thielen is a shitty #1 option so aaarrrrggghhhh FUUUUUUUUUG HIM!!! This dude SUCKS!!! Yeah, Thielen should no longer be a #1 option at this stage in his career. He honestly shouldn't be a starter at this point in his career. But it's not an Adam Thielen issue that we've had to ask him to do that.
×
×
  • Create New...