Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Over/Under sack totals for 2013 with Star and KK added


SIGCHI222

Recommended Posts

I actually expect around the same, maybe a little bit more. I think the presence of Star and the spelling of players to remain fresh is gonna apply more pressure. And more pressure means more inconsistencies from the QB. We will be a better team regardless of more sacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You also have to consider blitzes. With Star taking on a double team and CJ getting the attention of a back or TE, that should leave some lanes to the QB open for LBs and DBs.

I also think you need to consider that we will be fresher, able to apply better pressure late in games.

They should get 50+, which is about 3 per game.

I think the biggest change you will see will be in the interception department. QBs cannot step up and they make mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This takes a ton of pressure off of Cam. He can develop as the feature player with out having to be the only attraction. The dline unit in front of the play of Kuechly could end up being the strength of the team more so than the play of Cam. He may even see less scrutiny for his mistakes because he will get extra opportunities to make the game winning plays. Sacks are momentum building plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went from Big KK to KK, just a shortening of a nickname. Guess double size gave him KK, big guy, Big KK. He covers it in his interview.

I can hear the crowds now with LUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKE, BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESE, TDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD,

MONEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEY, KRAKEN (doesn't really lend itself to a long chant), STAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR and KAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!

I am not drunk posting again, this is my sobe3r opinion...as far as you know.

50+ sacks peoples. Get on board the Panther D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...