Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Final Scene in the Movie Killing them Softly


TheRumGone

Recommended Posts

Ok so I don't know if this should go in the Tinderbox or here, but for those who haven't seen this movie don't look below at the video i'm about to post. If you haven't seen it, definitely check it out. It's from the writer/directer of the Jesse James movie with Brad Pitt, another fantastic movie.  I expect a lot of people haven't seen this movie, but for those that have it would be great to hear your opinion. Tonight was the second time i rented it in the last week.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The parts i'm talking about start around 1:50

 

It seemed like the entire movie was built up for this final payoff in the last scene.  Pretty controversial, but some of the feelings I've had working for corporations especially.  Anyways, I thought it was a fantastic movie, and a powerful ending to a great movie. Thought provoking to say the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Movie was OK, but IMO was a big let down.  I usually like movies like this, but it came as a bit over the top at the end.  Not a terrible movie but won't watch again.

 

I kind of know what you mean. I was expecting something completely different, but was honestly pleasantly surprised. I don't know how you thought it was over the top at the end though, it was pretty spot on with how Brad Pitt's character was the entire movie. My buddy and I who watched it rewinded the last scene probably five times, then talked about it for a good hour. I think that is what good movies are suppose to do. They start a dialogue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The movie itself should have been much much better considering the cast.

At one point you've got James Gandolfini rambling on about his ex wife for half an hour. Terrible writing.

 

I thought that was hilarious. To each his own i guess. Everything fit what the message of the movie was all about.

 

A lot of people hated the Jesse James movie but I loved it. This movie seems to have gone the same way. People loved it or were disappointed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought that was hilarious. To each his own i guess. Everything fit what the message of the movie was all about.

A lot of people hated the Jesse James movie but I loved it. This movie seems to have gone the same way. People loved it or were disappointed.

The dialogue alone pretty much ruined the film for me. Not to mention the slow motion hit.

I wanted to like the movie, it actually had some good parts but they were overshadowed by the bad for me.

I'm assuming you are referring to the Brad Pitt movie about Jesse James? I'll have to catch that one day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The dialogue alone pretty much ruined the film for me. Not to mention the slow motion hit.

I wanted to like the movie, it actually had some good parts but they were overshadowed by the bad for me.

I'm assuming you are referring to the Brad Pitt movie about Jesse James? I'll have to catch that one day.

 

Yea i really liked everything about this movie, so i don't know what to say. You probably will hate the Jesse James movie then. Very slow moving movie with an amazing soundtrack by Nick Cave. Great dialogue that really gets into the mind of Jesse James and Robert Ford. But again, VERY slow movie. It's close to 3 hours long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks for this thread TRG!  I honestly didn't get any feel for what the movie was about from trailers and then I saw this a week or so ago but avoided clicking on the video so I wouldn't spoil it.

 

I checked it out and to me, the whole movie was worth the final scene.  Could they have done some things differently?  Sure.  But, I liked that the movie was concise, full of action, and then Pitt's monologue at the end was an exclamation point.  And I ABSOLUTELY loved the cinematography and the way it was shot...  From the opening credits to the final scene.  Amazing work.

 

I plan on buying it...  I think the movie speaks to how many people feel today and I like how they interspersed clips of political speeches and commentary throughout and then brought it all together at the end...  it ran parallel it to Pitt's work in the way it was illustrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...