Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quentin Jammer


Recommended Posts

All fine answers.  Trust me....I'm extremely optimistic, but it's with caution.  Until we can prove that we can close games then we're not a playoff team.  Going against our schedule next year, there's no way you can assume we're a top 8 team.  Especially when you would assume that SF-Seattle are both getting in.  That leaves our division and then a Wild Card.  From 7-9 to 13-3 to catch ATL is a long way to go.  Hell....10 wins didn't even get teams in last year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All fine answers.  Trust me....I'm extremely optimistic, but it's with caution.  Until we can prove that we can close games then we're not a playoff team.  Going against our schedule next year, there's no way you can assume we're a top 8 team.  Especially when you would assume that SF-Seattle are both getting in.  That leaves our division and then a Wild Card.  From 7-9 to 13-3 to catch ATL is a long way to go.  Hell....10 wins didn't even get teams in last year.

Can't know how hard the schedule is until the season starts to play out.

 

I have seen seasons where the hardest schedule turned out to be middle of the pack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam fumbles or Nak does not brain fart.....we beat Atlanta.

 

Smitty does not fall down after we dominated Chicago all day....we beat Chicago

 

Cam does not throw the 4yd pass into the dirt instead of to a wide open Hartsock...we beat Seattle

 

Rivera does not brain fart and play prevent against TB (while up by 11 with 3 min to go)...we beat TB

 

 

This team was easily a 10 win team last season...plain and simple.

 

If we would have won 2-3 of those fluke games, we would be considered a contender this season.

 

Yes...but we DIDN'T win those games.  For two years now we have not won those kind of games.  So you're assuming that none of those teams had "shoulda-coulda" instances in their loses?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i see people say this about players already on the team quite often and i've even said so myself in the past, but i'm more concerned with getting the best players on the field and winning than just seeing what some unknown commodities with promise have.

 

i'm more interested with winning than i am appeasing my curiousity re: young players.

 

if he's affordable and he can make us better....go get him. if the young guys can't beat him for a spot, move along.

 

Your last point shouldn't be understated. Young players need to step up and move the old guys out the way if they want to play. If they can't, then they need to continue to hone their skills with the second team, and learn from the sidelines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't know how hard the schedule is until the season starts to play out.

 

I have seen seasons where the hardest schedule turned out to be middle of the pack.

 

yeah man...I hear ya.  But I feel pretty confident that it's going to be a brutal schedule.  The most winnable games are early - we haven't started out fast the past two seasons.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam fumbles or Nak does not brain fart.....we beat Atlanta.

 

Smitty does not fall down after we dominated Chicago all day....we beat Chicago

 

Cam does not throw the 4yd pass into the dirt instead of to a wide open Hartsock...we beat Seattle

 

Rivera does not brain fart and play prevent against TB (while up by 11 with 3 min to go)...we beat TB

 

 

This team was easily a 10 win team last season...plain and simple.

 

If we would have won 2-3 of those fluke games, we would be considered a contender this season.

 

Exactly.  I'm sure every team had a game or two where 1 play was the difference between a win or a loss.  We had 4.  On top of another record year for injuries.  This is a good team that needs to learn how to finish.  They finished games down the stretch last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly.  I'm sure every team had a game or two where 1 play was the difference between a win or a loss.  We had 4.  On top of another record year for injuries.  This is a good team that needs to learn how to finish.  They finished games down the stretch last year.

 

Not like the Atlanta, Chicago, and Seattle game.

 

Those were more than making a play for a win.  Those were absolutely unlucky fluke plays that all went against us.

 

But, my point is still valid.  This team is talented and very close to the playoffs.  They are not a talent depleted team who is lucky to win 6-7 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah man...I hear ya.  But I feel pretty confident that it's going to be a brutal schedule.  The most winnable games are early - we haven't started out fast the past two seasons.  

Lets put the schedule crap to bed.

 

We are ALWAYS going to be near the top in the hardest schedule when we are in the NFC South. As long as these 4 teams beat up on each other it will be that way.

 

Take the NFC South out of the equation and we are middle of the road. 

 

3 - 3 last year and should be no less than that this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets put the schedule crap to bed.

 

We are ALWAYS going to be near the top in the hardest schedule when we are in the NFC South. As long as these 4 teams beat up on each other it will be that way.

 

Take the NFC South out of the equation and we are middle of the road. 

 

3 - 3 last year and should be no less than that this season. 

 

 

Why would you put the "schedule crap to bed" when you're talking about the team making the playoffs?  That makes zero sense.  If we're fighting for a Wild Card spot (and it seems like that's our best shot - on paper) then it has all the relevance in the world.  If we got to play the Rams and Cardinals twice a year then wouldn't you say that would increase our chances on making a Wild Card?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plus if you're giving us 3-3 in our Division this year...that only leaves 3 more games we can lose to match last year's bottom Wild Card team.  And 10 wins isn't even a guarantee.....ask Chicago.  So again....the schedule is absolutely relevant.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you put the "schedule crap to bed" when you're talking about the team making the playoffs?  That makes zero sense.  If we're fighting for a Wild Card spot (and it seems like that's our best shot - on paper) then it has all the relevance in the world.  If we got to play the Rams and Cardinals twice a year then wouldn't you say that would increase our chances on making a Wild Card?  

 

Because as long as you play in the NFC South you are going to have one of the toughest schedules.  Unless someone goes 2-14 like we did.  When teams are neck and neck like we are the schedule is going to be tough.

 

Plus the schedule is based on the previous season and how often do we have a turnaround in the playoffs.  So while you say so in so is a tough team.  In the end you have to base your team off this year NOT LAST YEAR. 

 

The toughness of schedule is nothing more than the medias way of trying to figure out who will be where. 

 

I can guarantee you the coaches and players could give a rats ass about the toughness of the schedule.  In fact, it is IRRELEVANT.

 

You use schedule to justify why you think we will win or lose this season.  What you should be doing is going down the rosters of the teams we are playing and seeing what they added and what they lost to give yourself a better determination on who is tough.  Not last season record. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you've nailed what we need right here.  Rodriguez and Thieneman would be my choices, Thieneman in the first and Rodriguez in the second. Let everyone else eat up their picks on the crop of WRs and linemen. Then make a push in free agency for the top center.
    • Vernon Gholston vibes?  had 14 sacks at Ohio State in 2007; 45 games in the NFL:  0 sacks.  
    • I want a high impact player, but a true FS who could qb the secondary might be more effective than we realize.  I don't think Moehrig is that guy (I think he is overpaid, however).  I want a flashy, high impact player, but we could use defensive qbs at ILB  and FS.  By upgrading skill AND adding vision and leadership, could we get better than if we added an edge or OT? I am not sure that I believe this myself, but I try to look at things from all perspectives.  Here is some devil's advocacy stuff: 1. EDGE-We are freaking out about the pressure we put on the qb from the edge position.  However, Jones II and Wonnum missed a total of 22 games. Scourton was a rookie and Princely was a third rounder.  Wharton sucked (not sure if he was used properly--a hybrid who can rush from the 5 tech or 3, etc), and this put more pressure on Scourton and the other edge players.  This year, we get Jones II, Scourton should continue to evolve with Princely.  Perhaps another rookie is not what we need.  Maybe a veteran situational pass rusher.  2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  Of course, we need an OT, but the draft is loaded with OTs that can pass block but struggle in run blocking--so a rookie at LT might not be the answer for a team that wants to run first.  What to do?  I am not sure.  I see Nijman returning after testing the market, but who knows? 3.  INSIDE LB:  A huge need, regardless of how you spin it.  However, I see a few free agents who would be solid here, and I see the second round having a few ILBs with starting potential.  I do not see an ILB worth the first round pick unless a freak falls to us. 4.  With veteran defensive backs, a young, intelligent FS could fit in nicely. Intelligence is key--like the way Luke made the front 7 better. "A good, intelligent free safety (FS) acts as the "quarterback of the defense" transforming a unit from good to great by acting as the last line of defense, communicating pre-snap adjustments, and anticipating plays before they happen. By reading the quarterback's eyes and diagnosing offensive schemes, an intelligent FS acts as a "centerfielder" who can neutralize deep threats and mitigate errors made by cornerbacks or linebackers."  
×
×
  • Create New...