Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam's second half improvement

SgtJoo

By SgtJoo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted

Cam will only get better as time goes on and are any of us bold enough to say that cam on any team with a decent defense in 11 and a competent OC in 12 wouldn't have made the playoffs? My point is, we have a stud under center and we may finally have those two aforementioned things to complement him(competent OC and decent defense). This could be a great year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iBBB Newbie

iBBB

Posted
Posted

That's not what he's saying at all. For the first have the season lets saying Rodgers has a 96.4 passer rating. Then the second half of the second he have a 96.8 passer rating. He's stayed the same. While Bradford can have 79.2 passer rating the first half and a 79.4 passer rating the last half they both with show as staying the same. He's not staying Bradford is on par with Rodgers just that the graph isn't showing the context of they've been throwing. So blanket statements like the ones in the middle are more consistent isn't completely true

 

it actually is true and you explained it yourself.

 

being consistent means staying at/around your average passer rating.

 

you can stay consistent at 20% or 120%, it means that your passer rating doesnt fluctuate throughout the season.

 

so in other words, bradford is consistent at sucking ass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted

it's 2nd half of the season, not 2nd half of games.

 

So "crunch time" only applies to the second half of football games?

 

Period?

 

And never at any other time?

 

So winning 6 out of your last 8 games to ensure you make the playoffs isn't doing it at "crunch time"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nosuchthingasapanther Explorer

nosuchthingasapanther

Posted
Posted

it actually is true and you explained it yourself.

 

being consistent means staying at/around your average passer rating.

 

you can stay consistent at 20% or 120%, it means that your passer rating doesnt fluctuate throughout the season.

 

so in other words, bradford is consistent at sucking ass. 

 

thank you for clearing this up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nickzz Newbie

nickzz

Posted
Posted

So "crunch time" only applies to the second half of football games?

 

Period?

 

And never at any other time?

 

So winning 6 out of your last 8 games to ensure you make the playoffs isn't doing it at "crunch time"?

 

i don't know. when people say crunch time i think the end of games.

 

as for the bolded statement, you were the one saying he wasn't performing during crunch time so i don't know why you're directing that towards me. i just clarified what the graph was illustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted

 

as for the bolded statement, you were the one saying he wasn't performing during crunch time so i don't know why you're directing that towards me. i just clarified what the graph was illustrating.

 

That's exactly what I was saying.

 

 Because Luck's performance was less-than-average in most of those games BUT HIS TEAM WAS WINNING ANYWAY.

 

Luck's worst performances of the year were in the 2nd half of the season in games they critically needed to win to get into the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaCoolin Newbie

CarolinaCoolin

Posted
Posted

it actually is true and you explained it yourself.

being consistent means staying at/around your average passer rating.

you can stay consistent at 20% or 120%, it means that your passer rating doesnt fluctuate throughout the season.

so in other words, bradford is consistent at sucking ass.

Yeah you didn't listen either. Good job. I said not completely true. While its true they were consistent they weren't on the same level which what i was trying to tell the person I responded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

You know who I am getting a little sick of getting a ton of attention: Ryan Tannehill- the guy hasn't proven anything, yet people are picking the Dolphins to win the division. Brady could pick three random huddlers  to be his starting wide-outs and still be a better QB than Tannehill next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lovelett Newbie

lovelett

Posted
Posted

You know who I am getting a little sick of getting a ton of attention: Ryan Tannehill- the guy hasn't proven anything, yet people are picking the Dolphins to win the division. Brady could pick three random huddlers to be his starting wide-outs and still be a better QB than Tannehill next year.

That is exactly what is happening down here in Florida, everyone thinks tannehill is going to dominate and Wallace is going to get 1500 yards. i hate the patriots as much as everyone else but tannehill was not even good last year and now they are going to beat the Pats?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Icege
      Tetairoa McMillan

      By Icege · Posted

      So you think that the play is solely Bryce's fault and that all 31 other QBs turn that play into a passing TD in spite of an incorrect route from WR1, immediate blindside pressure, a lazy route on the opposite side, and WR2 not on the same page as the QB? That's a lot of oversimplification just to be able to blame one player.
    • Gapanthersfan
      Is Tepper going to clean the house again after this season?

      By Gapanthersfan · Posted

      The thing with cleaning house… who the hell wants to actually work for Tepper?! What good coach with options would take that gig? There are literally 31  better teams to work for…. This is the WORST place for a coach to work… and it’s not even close. Auto-firing staff after 1-2 years will only make things worse.  If candidates know they are going to be auto-fired when being dumped in to an impossible situation, then why even apply? Tepp has to show candidates that he’s calmed the f down. The best thing is for him to not make any major franchise decisions for a while.  Just imagine where we would be right now with Wilks, Darnold, Foreman, Luvu, Moore,  the king’s ransom they were offered for Burns and the picks they traded away for Young… tell me with a straight face that blowing all of that up was the right move compared to where we are today. Wilks and Darnold were bridges to a better place.  My point being, EVERY major franchise decision from Tepp has been a disaster. He blows everything up, even if it shows signs of potential. He has refused to hire a ‘my way or no way’ type coach with proven NFL success.  I promise you he doesn’t have a friend in the entire building.  besides changing out Evero who has been given years to make it work, this is the best case scenario for the foreseeable future until the next draft. I don’t think Canales is the right coach for the job, but tying him to Young isn’t fair. He deserves at least another season with his own guy that he chooses. 
    • LinvilleGorge
      Tetairoa McMillan

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Yeah, he did. But what absolutely killed any chance of success is that our QB panicked and sailed the ball through the endzone uncatchable. That's why the focus is on that. Why do we need to do all these mental gymnastics to keep trying to come up with excuses to cover for the worst starting QB in the NFL over the past three years? What else do we kneed to see from him to admit he ain't ir? You don't trade up to #1 overall to draft a QB that needs everything to go perfectly to succeed. You're doing that because you think you're drafting a guy who can carry an offense.
×
×
  • Create New...