Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Obscure songs from your formative years that kids today would hate...

Zod

By Zod,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

TANTRIC-NINJA Community Regular

TANTRIC-NINJA

Posted
Posted

I present Savatage!! You know them today as Trans-Siberian Orchrestra today...RIP Chriss Olivia.. My guitar hero.

This is still an album i adore bc of the great endless guitar riffage in it..but its really Lord of The Rings metal..my wife makes fun of me a bit for this so Ill just bombard her with King Diamond to punish all of us in the car for her insolence!! I was going to King Diamond you guys but thought twice about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TANTRIC-NINJA Community Regular

TANTRIC-NINJA

Posted
Posted

some folks don't know what obscure means

What? Alice In Chains, Ac/Dc, Bruce springsteen does not fit the obscure?...or a song kids will not like today...this is more guilty pleasure/poo you would be embarassed to have a co worker or boss know you listen too or still love to this day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TANTRIC-NINJA Community Regular

TANTRIC-NINJA

Posted
Posted

this is funny c,ause my fiance is 11 years younger than me. I get her to go on youtube & watch old videos from glam groups all the time. brittany fox has got to be the worst? maybe dangerous toys though?

I am going with Trixster...thank god for grunge to kill off all the hair bands..it was a sacrifice even bands I liked deserved to die bc the corporate hairband thing killed me every day.

Bullet Boys or Faster Pussycat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harris Aballah Newbie

Harris Aballah

Posted
Posted

I am going with Trixster...thank god for grunge to kill off all the hair bands..it was a sacrifice even bands I liked deserved to die bc the corporate hairband thing killed me every day.

Bullet Boys or Faster Pussycat?

wow i had forgotten all about all three of those bands. white lions when the children cry is good for a laugh. I got her to play it the other night and could not believe how bad that dudes voice really was! lol! the welcome to the jungle video makes me laugh to just seeing axl all glammed out. but them and alice n chains really did close the door in glambands faces.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TANTRIC-NINJA Community Regular

TANTRIC-NINJA

Posted
Posted

faster pussycat put out a pretty good album just a few years back

If you were not singing about dragons or conjuring up a demon you were weak sauce in my metal book.

I just hated most all glam bands bc I like guys who can play their insturments...

White Lion: Little Fighter guitar solo is still one of the best I have ever heard..but yes they are terrible lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...