Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

fox sports video- Steve Smith on differences between him and Cam


philw5289

Recommended Posts

Interesting stuff. Kalil and other players comments have led me to believe Chud's play calling was very popular among players. Also i really feel bad for Beast and no wants to see him come back more than his fans.

 

Chuds playcalling WAS POPULAR or  UNPOPULAR? Lol

 

Most I've heard from, it didn't sound so popular. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting stuff. Kalil and other players comments have led me to believe Chud's play calling was very popular among players. Also i really feel bad for Beast and no wants to see him come back more than his fans.

 

yeah, appears he was a problem to most everyone in the locker room who speaks on Chud (or asked about him)...

 

 

seems like they would know best...

 

 

 

 

edit:  heard the interview, he didn't mention him specifically, but pretty much word for word with what others have said...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chud's the easy scapegoat, since he's gone, but he was here when we finished winning 5 of the last 6, and that's what they'll try and reproduce going forward. If we have a good season and get in the playoffs I don't care who gets the credit for this year or the blame for last year. The good and bad labels are gonna get applied to the likely targets no matter what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chud's the easy scapegoat, since he's gone, but he was here when we finished winning 5 of the last 6, and that's what they'll try and reproduce going forward. If we have a good season and get in the playoffs I don't care who gets the credit for this year or the blame for last year. The good and bad labels are gonna get applied to the likely targets no matter what.

We don't know what goes on behind the scenes. Maybe Shula was more involved in game planning for those last few games. We had a huge turnaround in what we were doing offensively and it's hard to believe anyone would overhaul the play calling after 1 1/2 seasons of the same ish without outside opinions.

I do believe Chuds want to constantly run the read option actually hurt us more than it helped. Cams got all the tool to be a great play action QB so he can improvise with his legs if he has to.

I would like to see him get to the point of making changes on the line based on what he sees. If he was able to audible into a read option because he sees that the numbers are in their favor, make that decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...