Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The New York Giants Offensive Line

Cyberjag

By Cyberjag,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Cyberjag Newbie

Cyberjag

Posted
Posted

David Gettleman was the pro personnel director for the Giants from 1999-2011.  During that time, the Giants won two Super Bowls, and averaged 9 wins a season, and 12th in offensive production.  So assume he picked up some knowledge of how to put together an offense somewhere along the way, ok?  What were his offensive lines made of?

 

In his first year the Giants spent a 1st on a lineman, Luke Petitgout.  From that point forward, the line consisted of Petitgout and late round guys who were picked up in free agency.  By 2002, the line had Petitgout, a Giants 5th rounder from 1999, and three UDFAs on it.  The following year they started two rookies, a 5th rounder and a 7th rounder.  In 2004 they added a 2nd rounder.

 

In 2007, their Super Bowl team use a line that consisted of a 4th year 5th rounder, a 3rd year 2nd rounder, a 6th year 3rd round washout from the Jets, and two UDFAs in their 6th and 7th years, respectively.  They stood pat with that line until 2010, when they replaced one of the UDFAs with a 4th year guy drafted by the Raiders in the 6th. 

 

Given that experience, how likely is it that Gettleman is going to go trade for a guy who can come in and be an instant starter?  How likely is it that he feels like the line can be fixed through coaching, or at the very least adjusted to? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mwright350 Rising Star

mwright350

Posted
Posted

David Gettleman was the pro personnel director for the Giants from 1999-2011.  During that time, the Giants won two Super Bowls, and averaged 9 wins a season, and 12th in offensive production.  So assume he picked up some knowledge of how to put together an offense somewhere along the way, ok?  What were his offensive lines made of?

 

In his first year the Giants spent a 1st on a lineman, Luke Petitgout.  From that point forward, the line consisted of Petitgout and late round guys who were picked up in free agency.  By 2002, the line had Petitgout, a Giants 5th rounder from 1999, and three UDFAs on it.  The following year they started two rookies, a 5th rounder and a 7th rounder.  In 2004 they added a 2nd rounder.

 

In 2007, their Super Bowl team use a line that consisted of a 4th year 5th rounder, a 3rd year 2nd rounder, a 6th year 3rd round washout from the Jets, and two UDFAs in their 6th and 7th years, respectively.  They stood pat with that line until 2010, when they replaced one of the UDFAs with a 4th year guy drafted by the Raiders in the 6th. 

 

Given that experience, how likely is it that Gettleman is going to go trade for a guy who can come in and be an instant starter?  How likely is it that he feels like the line can be fixed through coaching, or at the very least adjusted to? 

 

He probably does think he could fix it through coaching / adjustment given unlimited time.

 

Thing is he's also a smart guy and a football guy.  He knows you can do damage to a QB that will last their entire career by playing them behind an OL that consistently gets them smacked around with hit numbers in the top of the league.  Both psyche damage and mechanical issues that develop and don't recover.  With Cam coming into the league with footwork that needed help and an accuracy problem on the short throws anyway we shouldn't be trying to afford playing him behind a line that clearly can't protect him.

 

I think if he can find help he can afford he will bring in help because Cam needs better protection now, not when this group of tackling dummies gets their poo together.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pejorative Miscreant Grand Master

Pejorative Miscreant

Posted
Posted

David Gettleman was the pro personnel director for the Giants from 1999-2011.  During that time, the Giants won two Super Bowls, and averaged 9 wins a season, and 12th in offensive production.  So assume he picked up some knowledge of how to put together an offense somewhere along the way, ok?  What were his offensive lines made of?

 

In his first year the Giants spent a 1st on a lineman, Luke Petitgout.  From that point forward, the line consisted of Petitgout and late round guys who were picked up in free agency.  By 2002, the line had Petitgout, a Giants 5th rounder from 1999, and three UDFAs on it.  The following year they started two rookies, a 5th rounder and a 7th rounder.  In 2004 they added a 2nd rounder.

 

 

From a long term perspective this is refreshing.  But today, August 23rd in the year of our Lord 2013, our offensive line sucks really, big big biiiiiiig ass parts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
2jakefansinva Newbie

2jakefansinva

Posted
Posted

David Gettleman was the pro personnel director for the Giants from 1999-2011.  During that time, the Giants won two Super Bowls, and averaged 9 wins a season, and 12th in offensive production.  So assume he picked up some knowledge of how to put together an offense somewhere along the way, ok?  What were his offensive lines made of?

 

In his first year the Giants spent a 1st on a lineman, Luke Petitgout.  From that point forward, the line consisted of Petitgout and late round guys who were picked up in free agency.  By 2002, the line had Petitgout, a Giants 5th rounder from 1999, and three UDFAs on it.  The following year they started two rookies, a 5th rounder and a 7th rounder.  In 2004 they added a 2nd rounder.

 

In 2007, their Super Bowl team use a line that consisted of a 4th year 5th rounder, a 3rd year 2nd rounder, a 6th year 3rd round washout from the Jets, and two UDFAs in their 6th and 7th years, respectively.  They stood pat with that line until 2010, when they replaced one of the UDFAs with a 4th year guy drafted by the Raiders in the 6th. 

 

Given that experience, how likely is it that Gettleman is going to go trade for a guy who can come in and be an instant starter?  How likely is it that he feels like the line can be fixed through coaching, or at the very least adjusted to? 

 

 

nice info...........the Gman is probably working his ass off right now finding that gem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By CRA · Posted

      A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • WUnderhill
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
    • kungfoodude
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Yeah, this is all projections of how it will turn out. Inevitability this list will look ridiculous in a full 2025 sesson hindsight, most likely. Still, I am pretty surprised that so many bristled at being thought of as having very, very lowly ranked WR and TE units. We literally have been for years. All you have to do is just have things stay the same and those are immediately bottom 5 units. It is easy to see why one would be reticent to have lofty expectations in the preseason. Gotta show it first when you are a perennial cellar dweller. That's just life at the bottom.
×
×
  • Create New...