Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera says we are done signing linemen.

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jarhead Newbie

jarhead

Posted
Posted

so you are saying that you don't think our QB and RB's would be successful in a traditional NFL Offense?

 

lol

 

No that is not what I said. What I said is that there are schemes that play to the strengths of our qb and rbs given the skill set of our OL and FB which quite frankly suck for the offense Shula has shown so far. Have you seen any holes yet that a rb can be successful running through? You sound like my wife.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

We were a losing team those years due largely to the o-line sucking. We're supposed to sit back and relax as the team does the same thing, but expects different results?

We scored enough points to win in most of those games. It was giving up big plays late by the defense that lost it for us.  We were not blown out in very many games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

Okay, so you think a lameduck, hot seat, or a coach with a totally secure job has zero impact on how a GM operates....I think all that impacts a

GM and is proven based on the actions of GMs all over the league including our franchise. We disagree. It's cool.

You are using a lame duck reference incorrectly.  Fox was a lame duck because he was on the last year of his contract and was not going to come back no matter what.  Rivera is signed through 2014 and by all accounts is liked by Richardson and Gettleman.  Obviously he has to win but what coach save a dozen are not in the same boat.

 

And no I don't  think the coaches status dictates how the GM builds the team.  He is building it the way he wants and expects the coach to follow suit.  It is more likely that  Rivera is doing what the GM wants done not the other way around.  You have it backwards. Rivera works for Gettleman not the other way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

You are using a lame duck reference incorrectly. Fox was a lame duck because he was on the last year of his contract and was not going to come back no matter what. Rivera is signed through 2014 and by all accounts is liked by Richardson and Gettleman. Obviously he has to win but what coach save a dozen are not in the same boat.

And no I don't think the coaches status dictates how the GM builds the team. He is building it the way he wants and expects the coach to follow suit. It is more likely that Rivera is doing what the GM wants done not the other way around. You have it backwards. Rivera works for Gettleman not the other way around.

I used it correctly...didn't refer to RR as a lameduck....he was the hotseat coach. I gave 3 different examples of types of coaches a GM could have....all impact the FO in various ways IMO.

and it is an awkward marriage IMO....and JR is at fault for making so many of those in such a small window.

By all accounts, Richardson made a big production of not firing Rivera after last season....that is not he sign of JR being happy. Nor were the reports if true he wasnt really about him to begin with

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

I used it correctly...didn't refer to RR as a lameduck....he was the hotseat coach. I gave 3 different examples of types of coaches a GM could have....all impact the FO in various ways IMO.

and it is an awkward marriage IMO....and JR is at fault for making so many of those in such a small window.

By all accounts, Richardson made a big production of not firing Rivera after last season....that is not he sign of JR being happy. Nor were the reports if true he wasnt really about him to begin with

You have no idea what the relationship is between RIvera, Richardson or Gettleman except what has been stated which is they have a good relationship. You also don't know if Accorsi who was helping JR make the GM decision and was good friends with Gettleman discussed Rivera with Gettleman and got approval as part of the hiring process.  He didn't make a big deal of not firing him.  He likely was waiting to take to all the parties involved and get feedback before making a decision.   Again with the negative assumptions which is where you always go.  I had hope as a mod you might modify your approach a  bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

You have no idea what the relationship is between RIvera, Richardson or Gettleman except what has been stated which is they have a good relationship. You also don't know if Accorsi who was helping JR make the GM decision and was good friends with Gettleman discussed Rivera with Gettleman and got approval as part of the hiring process. He didn't make a big deal of not firing him. He likely was waiting to take to all the parties involved and get feedback before making a decision. Again with the negative assumptions which is where you always go. I had hope as a mod you might modify your approach a bit.

Again, I know for a fact Jerry Richardson made a big production of not firing Ron Rivera and made him sweat it out. You can easily find 50 articles addressing it...

And yes, considering Rivera was in the middle if his contract and JR played that game.....he made a big deal of it.

Acknowledging the reality of that isn't being negative.

Again, we disagree. I can handle that. We look at things different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

Again, I know for a fact Jerry Richardson made a big production of not firing Ron Rivera and made him sweat it out. You can easily find 50 articles addressing it...

And yes, considering Rivera was in the middle if his contract and JR played that game.....he made a big deal of it.

Acknowledging the reality of that isn't being negative.

Again, we disagree. I can handle that. We look at things different.

I know for a fact that the newspapers made a big deal about it.  Did Richardson say anything in an interview??  No. Did he make any public statements at the time except when he made his decision?  All he said was that things needed to improve.  Wow, that sure was a big deal. If this had been Jerry Jones it would have been a big deal.  Richardson is low key with the media and always has been.

 

Your reality is negative.  Not something we share at all, thank goodness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OneBadCat Grand Master

OneBadCat

Posted
Posted

RR is the 180 version of John Fox as far as talking to the press. Fox said nothing. I believe Rivera says too much. He needs to dial it back a little.

 

I think Rivera is about as bad as Fox. He says a bunch of BS that doesn't mean anything. He's basically saying it is what it is with a bunch of different words. He doesn't really say anything that insightful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jarhead Newbie

jarhead

Posted
Posted

It doesn't mean a thing. 

 

Number 1 we do not know who will even be available until final cuts. Teams are always looking to upgrade at the right price. Number 2 ...he is not going to come out to the media and say that we are looking for A RT to replace Bell.

 

I would not read one thing into this

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted

I don't believe for a second RR and Gettleman are on the same page nor do I believe they have a very good professional relationship. I think Gettleman got saddled with Rivera at Jerry Richardson's insistence and until he (Gettleman) can put his own head coach on the field and there is a true, collaborative effort with respect to personnel, we have to endure another season of the front office effecting the team on the field.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

I don't believe for a second RR and Gettleman are on the same page nor do I believe they have a very good professional relationship. I think Gettleman got saddled with Rivera at Jerry Richardson's insistence and until he (Gettleman) can put his own head coach on the field and there is a true, collaborative effort with respect to personnel, we have to endure another season of the front office effecting the team on the field.

And you know this because you are Kreskin or some other soothsayer?  You have an inside source or Gettleman is your neighbor.  Or like with other conspiracy theorists you made it up in your own head so it must be true......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted

And you know this because you are Kreskin or some other soothsayer?  You have an inside source or Gettleman is your neighbor.  Or like with other conspiracy theorists you made it up in your own head so it must be true......

 

My opinion, wtf.....

 

Is this forum not allowing opinions anymore? Seriously?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...