Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game Grades - Seahawks at Panthers


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

huh?

 

Godfrey looks like the exact same player he has always been, a subpar safety.

 

He was late and took terrible angles. It's fuggin inexcusable at this point in his career.

 

And I'm being tough on Dwill, but he did have two fumbles, one of them lost us the game. The other easily could've took a lucky bounce and changed the game even earlier on.

 

These guy's aren't fugging rookies anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Godfrey looks like the exact same player he has always been, a subpar safety.

 

He was late and took terrible angles. It's fuggin inexcusable at this point in his career.

 

And I'm being tough on Dwill, but he did have two fumbles, one of them lost us the game. The other easily could've took a lucky bounce and changed the game even earlier on.

 

These guy's aren't fugging rookies anymore.

I'm too tired to beat the Godfrey drum any longer.....that is why he got moved to SS. Godfrey is forever late giving help to a CB. I just think Godfrey has a low football IQ....bc he has the physical tools to be good. He just never can get where he needs to be consistantly when in the FS role.

I prefer him as a blitzing fleshbomb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the secondary was not good at all.  They allowed too many people uncovered.  I think it might be scheme.  They would put one guy out wide and 2 guys in the slot and we tried to cover the 2 inside guys with one corner  five yards back and Godfrey 15 yards  back. The linebacker wasn't covering them past 6 to 8 yards given the focus on stopping the run. We just weren't fundamentally sound.  That needs to get fixed.  Can't give them more than a C-.  How many passed did we break up or intercept?  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the secondary was not good at all.  They allowed too many people uncovered.  I think it might be scheme.  They would put one guy out wide and 2 guys in the slot and we tried to cover the 2 inside guys with one corner  five yards back and Godfrey 15 yards  back. The linebacker wasn't covering them past 6 to 8 yards given the focus on stopping the run. We just weren't fundamentally sound.  That needs to get fixed.  Can't give them more than a C-.  How many passed did we break up or intercept?  

 

Allowed 12 points to a team that normally scores 30+.

 

Don't sweat the small stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • By all indications, the surgery was "minor." I know with all surgeries and especially back surgery there can be complications, but I think the whole time Tremble did this with the expectation he would be able to be back for Week 1 It sounds like he will be ready to start back in team drills next week. He's a veteran who knows the system so I'm sure that helps. I still can't imagine he will play a normal workload early on though 
    • Maybe. He was pretty good in college before a bad injury. He had a good preseason last year as a UDFA in Washington and was on their practice squad all year so they obviously saw something worth developing. He signed a futures deal with the Panthers earlier this year, and everything about him has been increasingly positive. Tremayne has gotten a decent amount of time with the ones, and a lot with the twos for someone that doesn't have a chance. He's the only other 6'4" plus WR on the team, plays ST, and is a more natural backup to the X receiver position than David Moore. That was my thinking behind it. But he may well end up as one of the last roster cuts. If so, I do hope they can bring him back to the PS. But I personally think there's a good chance he could be claimed given his ST ability and what hes shown at WR.
    • That was my thought originally, but so many of the beat writers have mentioned keeping 7 WRs in conversations that I went with that, at least for the purposes of this projection. But you're right that historically defensive guys who were standouts at ST have tradionally gotten those last spots  
×
×
  • Create New...