Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who would you use as head coach?


xclr82xtc

Recommended Posts

if you had your choice of any coach in the NFL.. or even college...  Who would you go for?

 

I think personally it have to be one of the Harbaugh Brothers as my first pick (prolly jim)   or Mike McCarthy...  MAYBE gary kubiak.... (always liked what he did with the texans)

 

 

and the best part of this entire post..

 

 

 

Chudpusy is last on the list!! i mean litterally! ..here see the list for yourself!

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/22790909/nfl-coach-rankings-personality-doesnt-matter-but-rings-sure-do

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I had any choice I would take Belichick over anyone with the caveat that he could not do our drafting.

Highly doubt you get Belichick without total control. His ego is almost an entity unto itself at this point.

I still prefer the 'build your own star' approach over any of the retread options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Belichick

College: David Shaw and Kevin Sumlin

Somebody bounced Sumlin's name around to me, and I have to admit he is intriguing.

Shaw would be nice but tough to get IMO.

I have always liked Petersen at Boise.

Charlie Strong is impressive to me but expensive.

The thing about getting a head coach is that they have an identity and belief in what they are doing because they have been successful.

Some people frown on stubborness (like Foxxy) but I think it can be good because I think coordinators are more susceptible to second guessing themselves and over correcting problems even if they don't really exist. Therefore it is hard to establish an identity. Create your identity and stick with it come hell or high water. Don't just change with the wind every time it isn't successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody bounced Sumlin's name around to me, and I have to admit he is intriguing.

Shaw would be nice but tough to get IMO.

I have always liked Petersen at Boise.

Charlie Strong is impressive to me but expensive.

The thing about getting a head coach is that they have an identity and belief in what they are doing because they have been successful.

Some people frown on stubborness (like Foxxy) but I think it can be good because I think coordinators are more susceptible to second guessing themselves and over correcting problems even if they don't really exist. Therefore it is hard to establish an identity. Create your identity and stick with it come hell or high water. Don't just change with the wind every time it isn't successful.

 

Yup, I absolutely agree.

 

When Foxy was here we knew exactly what his identity was: pound the football and played hard nose defense. Rivera has yet to identify what his identity is here in Carolina.

 

Hoping for the best with Rivera this season, but assuming if things go wrong I would wish that Sumlin would be a man Gman will target along with Greg Roman. Both of those guys have found success with mobile QBs (Kaep/Manziel) similar to Cam. It would be a match made in heaven if we could land one of those guy to coach Cam and this team. Also, we have found out that the NFL is not too big for college coaches to make the transition to.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares? One thing for sure is that Jim have a more consistent record of success to date than Rivera.

He's also an arrogant, infantile, emotionally volatile, duplicitous, glory-seeking, steaming pile of excrement masquerading as a head coach with a towering ego that overshadows his credible skills. Anyone with more than a cursory knowledge of Harbaugh's background knows that he has been very successful but that a lot of poisoned relationships and bad blood follows him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...