Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers - Bills Gameday Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Got the stupid mistakes out of the way last week and gave Seattle the game.  Today is about making a statement. Looking for a big win.

 

Offense gets 4 TD's

Defense and ST get 1 each.

 

 

GO PANTHERS!!!!!!!!

 

You predict the final score to 42?  28 of those points coming from an offense that barely woke up last week.  I do not know if I can see that.  Not for the Bills defense at all, but for the Panthers offense.  That's a tall task.  It was a tall task last year.  This is also a game at Buffalo - an often under appreciated stadium.  The defense for Buffalo is hollowed out in the secondary but the front 7 is full of what-was players and up-and-comers.  Who shows up on defense for the Bills?  Your guess is as good as mine...but 28 points by the offense would be a strong outting.  6 TD's total...that's a lot.  A very lot.  The Bills special teams is very good.  The offense has CJ Spiller and Fred Jackson.  Two RB's that can keep pounding the line and will.  There is no quit in FJax, and CJ is a homerun hitter.  He will get -2yds, 2yds or break one open for 20+.  There is no difference and if you see him start to hit holes, find a rythym and he gets his butt up field he will pick up yards.

 

Panthers will (I bet there is a thread for this, but I am rebelling against the norm.  My shrink said it was OK):

 

get 4 sacks

get 2 interceptions

score 4 TDs

win 34-17.

Lafell, Ginn, and Tolbert will have bigger roles. 2 will score TDs.  I am not telling which two.  That is a secret.

Luke will get 15 tackles, and one of the interceptions.  He could also recover a fumble, or he could not recover a fumble.  I am certain about one of them.

Watch for an unsuspecting hero. 

 

I do not want to spoil the outcome any more than this.  

I do not see 4 sacks against Manuel.  If Kolb was starting I could see 4 sacks.  The INT's...sure why not.  I think Buffalo is better then 17 points.  I expect both teams to put at least 20 points up.

 

An unsuspecting hero for the Bills D...Carrington, #92.  He is a high motor guy who is quick.  He played OLB in the 3-4 in the past few seasons.

 

at the ralph. where are we tailgating?

 

All ya'll better chose Hammers Lot, but you'd have had to get there by 8.

I don't see how the Bills score 17.

I think 17-9.

That would be a very disappointing game.  If the panthers can't score more then 17 on the Bills defense with Newton starting and a subpar DB unit for the Bills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...