Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam or Eli ?


carolinarolls

Recommended Posts

The Giants would not even think about it..Good God, I hope we start to win before too long. Some of these suggestions around here are fantastic. You think anybody is going to trade a 2 Time Super Bowl winning QB for a QB that doesnt even have a .500 record??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HEY GUYS

HEY

 

NEW HYPOTHETICAL

 

JOE MONTANA OR PEYTON MANNING

 

...yes, this is just as realistic as your situation.  Neither team would offer, let alone take, that deal

 

edit: ah fug it, let's play Madden, every other post in this forum has some abysmal trade so why not

 

No, you don't trade Eli Manning if you're the Giants.  He's won you 2 Superbowls.

 

You laugh Gettleman out of the building, because when you have a QB like that you don't let him go right now.  Maybe if he and the next coach spar a bunch then who knows, but now?  No way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giants would take that trade in a heartbeat.  Eli is 32 years old.  He has what, maybe 3 good years left?

 

 

I disagree...he's not young by any means but he's proven, and his worth over the next three years on that team is probably greater than Cam's would be.  They also, at least right now, wouldn't want to do that because of coaching reasons.

 

and if the Giants would go into rebuilding mode, they'd probably rather have draft picks than a QB that has basically become a castaway in that situation.

 

on the other hand, I also wouldn't do that if I were the Panthers, because we are about to get a new coach and it's not a good idea to bring in a new QB right before a new coach IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hope you understand that this Anti Bryce thing as you call it is really a pro Panthers thing. I think I can safely use we. We want the best for the Panthers.  As far as this other post saying ‘Anti’ Bryce people do misinformation.. you mean like going all in on “Renfro should have caught” that poorly thrown ball? I guess it was week 1. And calling it a drop. Comical btw.  I wonder, did you call that out or let it slide because it aligned with your agenda? 
    • These are great posts with the comparisons and the numbers.   I haven’t lookyat Smity’s numbers since probably the first time he was on the ballot.  But if you watched every week you know what he is. Whatever his yardage or targets numbers were.  He was fuging dominant. I have watched since the AFL days and seen who there is to see. There are many great WRs over the years. GREAT WRs. Smitty is up there in the game of football. 
    • Smith is clear cut HOF if you judge what he did by reception. Fitzgerald was a stat padder.    The most Steve Smith was ever targeted in his career was in 2005 (150 targets). The same year he wins the triple crown.    Larry Fitzgerald was targeted more than 150 times over 9 separate seasons. Not once eclipsing 1500 yards in a season.    The over glazing of Larry Fitzgerald going around is way over blown. ARZ was top 10 in passing attempts nearly his entire prime. Steve Smith and Andre Johnson had it far worse and would have surpassed his #s in the same situation.
×
×
  • Create New...