Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bill Barnwell on the Panthers[and Cam]


Gucci Mane

Recommended Posts

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9806344/bill-barnwell-carolina-panthers-offense

 

 

To them and those worried about Newton's development: chill. This is probably going to work out, because Newton is playing pretty well right now, just as he has over the course of his pro career. And even if Newton doesn't end up being the long-term answer in Carolina, consider that the guy who would be picking up the starting duties for the Panthers would be one Derek Anderson. You know, the guy who is last in completion percentage and passer rating and third-to-last in yards per attempt among passers with 1,000 attempts or more since he joined the league in 2006. The guy who lost jobs to Brady Quinn, John Skelton, and Max Hall the last time he got NFL reps.

 

 

 

Good and long article and he uses gifs to prove some points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That's where the faulty supporting cast around Newton starts: those receivers. For three years now, we've known the Panthers have needed to upgrade the receiving corps. Smith is tough as nails, but he's 34 and likely stretched as a starting wideout. He wasn't supposed to be the no. 1 guy by a significant margin at this point. The receivers around him have been players who didn't make it off special teams elsewhere in the league, guys like Legedu Naanee, Louis Murphy, and Ted Ginn. LaFell has settled in as the starter next to Ginn, but he's a raw player who has failed to exhibit many signs of refinement, even after starting 24 games as a pro. Tight end Greg Olsen is a competent starter, but everyone here is stretched into a role they're not good enough to handle. Smith would be a great second wideout, but he's a below-average top wideout. Olsen would be an excellent safety valve and occasional seam-splitter, but here he has to do his bad impression of Owen Daniels. LaFell would be a fifth wideout on some teams. Ginn wouldn't take offensive snaps for half the league. That's not the case in Charlotte.

.

.

.

 

It's also fair to say Newton isn't currently in the best coaching situation available. While Colin Kaepernick gets to study under Jim Harbaugh and Andrew Luck works with his former Stanford offensive coordinator, Pep Hamilton, Newton is stuck fighting with coaches who appear insistent upon playing against his strengths. Some of Newton's success during his rookie season is unquestionably owed to then–offensive coordinator Rob Chudzinski, who implemented the read-option as part of the Carolina playbook to ease Newton's transition into the NFL. A year later, it swept the league by storm with its success in Washington and San Francisco, but the Panthers spent the second half transitioning to a more conventional offense, a path they further traveled after Chudzinski left for the head coaching job in Cleveland and quarterbacks coach Mike Shula took over. The traditional scheme Shula set out to run was so boring and blasé that they've had to implement read-option plays just to give the offense a boost.

 

Shula's boss might be the biggest reason why Newton is struggling to win over the fans. I've written many times about how Rivera's conservative nature has cost the Panthers late in games, most recently in the Week 2 loss to the Bills. The Panthers are a whopping 2-14 in games decided by a touchdown or less with Newton and Rivera in town, and while Newton isn't immune to the occasional bad pass late in games, there are several contests amid these 16 that simply aren't Newton's fault. There's the loss to the Bills this year, when Rivera spurned a game-sealing fourth-and-1 at the end of the fourth quarter to punt and let his defense hold up. They gave up a game-winning touchdown with six seconds left. That wasn't much different from the Falcons game in Atlanta from the previous year, when the Panthers held the lead deep in the fourth quarter with a chance to seal things, only for the Panthers to punt and promptly give up a game-winning touchdown less than two minutes later. If Rivera were making optimal decisions deep into the game, they wouldn't be this bad in close contests. And if they weren't this bad in close games, the fans wouldn't be anywhere near as hard on Newton as they might be right now. They might have had a 9-7 team last year and a 2-2 team right now. They would have seen a team with a steadily improving record and projected that onto Newton instead.

 

i'm not going to be able to disagree with much of any of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

It's also fair to say Newton isn't currently in the best coaching situation available. While Colin Kaepernick gets to study under Jim Harbaugh and Andrew Luck works with his former Stanford offensive coordinator, Pep Hamilton, Newton is stuck fighting with coaches who appear insistent upon playing against his strengths. Some of Newton's success during his rookie season is unquestionably owed to then–offensive coordinator Rob Chudzinski, who implemented the read-option as part of the Carolina playbook to ease Newton's transition into the NFL. A year later, it swept the league by storm with its success in Washington and San Francisco, but the Panthers spent the second half transitioning to a more conventional offense, a path they further traveled after Chudzinski left for the head coaching job in Cleveland and quarterbacks coach Mike Shula took over. The traditional scheme Shula set out to run was so boring and blasé that they've had to implement read-option plays just to give the offense a boost.

 

 

Read that over and over and over and over until you fuging mouth breathers understand at least one fuging thing about football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...