Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The second to last drive


Jakob

Recommended Posts

This really upset me, we let Glennon carve up our defense, let me re phrase that. From what I saw it looked like we allowed them to go down the field and score. We gave the WR's a 10 yard cushion and then tackled them. I'm really disappointed in that kind of sloppy play. We let them score but in the end we shut them down in redzone to keep them scoring again. I'd love to hear everyone else opinion. 

 

If not for a few key drops we could of dropped 45+ points on the Tampons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every defense struggles during the 2 min drill. It happens a lot.

 

IDK if every defense has issues with 2 min drill, but you're right, it happens a lot, to us for sure.  Something we definitely need to work on.  If this is the case against Brees or Brady, they will quite possibly carve us up based upon past/present history.  Our D is great, but I am not so sure about our stats in the last two minutes with a slim lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate people that find things to complain about when we should be enjoying a win. A win is a win and nothing else matters at the end of the day. Get over it because all this bullshit stuff people are coming up with to whine about when we should be happy to get a win and finally be over 500 for the first time in 5 years is pissing me off. Knock it off

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...