Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Please No Psyco-Analysis of Cam's Game. Panthers won!


FootballMaestro

Recommended Posts

I find it amazing, that even here some posters (such as Xav8tor) want Cam to be perfect every game, while Drew Brees, Matt Ryan, Phillip Rivers, etc., all had INT's or multiple INT games. You can't be perfect in every game, especially the division (no matter the oppositions record). I think this was a good game for the Panthers leading into San Fran. Get the tough game out the way, and/or have the confidence to win another one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't stick your head in the sand guys. Cam looked as if he regressed somewhat, Shula made some whacky calls, and the WR's made more than a couple inexcusable mistakes. D did OK in the 2nd half, but the first was not stellar either.

Regressed slightly from amazing? Yeah, that will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regressed slightly from amazing? Yeah, that will happen.

 

I would not call poor decisions and numerous bad throws slight.  Maybe 89 pulled up on the one in the end zone, but throwing into double coverage on the other was just bad.  Two and half years into the game, there is no excuse for either.  Once every other game = OK, two or three per game, NO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't stick your head in the sand guys.  Cam looked as if he regressed somewhat, Shula made some whacky calls, and the WR's made more than a couple inexcusable mistakes.  D did OK in the 2nd half, but the first was not stellar either.

 

Saying words like regressed should be left out until a whole season is played. If you looked at ryan and brees today, you would say they regressed but they just played badly. Cam didn't play well today, but he could very well have 3 touchdowns and no ints against the niners next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't stick your head in the sand guys. Cam looked as if he regressed somewhat, Shula made some whacky calls, and the WR's made more than a couple inexcusable mistakes. D did OK in the 2nd half, but the first was not stellar either.

Yeah, you're clueless. The Falcons played hard and came in with a good gameplan. It happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I do think the rating is fair given how this unit hasn’t proven it with production. I understand you have to rank off production, not potential. However, our unit is also in a position to make this rating look foolish a year from now. We have 4 guys in the WR/TE room who all could legitimately take the next step this year, and catapult our rank. A guy under a lot of people’s radar after we took Tet, Jalen Coker. Mark my words, he will become the star of this room, and be the heir to Thielen.
    • Exactly. You’d think 2-7 wins a year (in a 17 game season no less) since 2017 is going to keep us bottom tier. Every year we say the same poo like we haven’t been a bad team the past 7 years. Until we prove we aren’t a bottom dweller, that’s where we’ll stay ranked. God forbid we have OL injuries like 2016.
    • What I love and hate about this team is it’s more filled with potential breakout players than ever before. JT, XL, Coker, Smith-Wade, Ikem, Trevin… and even Bryce are all guys I could legitimately see taking the next step. But the problem with having so many of those guys is that team success somewhat relies on them taking that step, and some are bound not to. That being said, I’m cautiously optimistic given our softer schedule, the way the offense clicked late last year, and the direction we finally have at GM, coach, and QB. Could see us as a sneaky playoff team.
×
×
  • Create New...