Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Need Math Help Plz


Jase

Recommended Posts

Uuugh, if B is the correct answer, then you have a 25% chance of getting it correct

God ur dumb Alice :rolleyes:

Actually I was just coming back to post exactly this, because if the answer is B, then B is 1 of the 4 answers which is 25%. But now that I type iit out, 25% is A) and D), 2 of the 4, which is then 50%! It's a trick! 50% leads to 25% to 50%. Haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, the more I read it, it seems like there is purpose ambiguity in there, I mean you can also argue that there are actually 3 answers given, which gives you a 1/2 * 1/4 * 1/4 chance of correct :

=33.3% which is not an answer so then 0%?

Something is up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Jase, what class is this for? The math involved is like 9th grade statistics and I assume you're much older. I ask because it seems like a trick question due to ambiguity, is it a sociology or psychology class? Does your view on answer supposed to mean something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...