Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another MNF Controversy?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Per Adam Schefter on ESPN, the clock operator at Bank of America Stadium allowed for an additional four seconds to run off the clock after Ted Ginn's touchdown play would have technically been over. Those four seconds, Schefter asserts, would have given Tom Brady and the Patriots one more play to try and score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brady threw a INT it really doesn't matter cause he wouldnt have got another shot anyway

Yeah, Schefter skipped that part :lol:

Also, my understanding has always been that official game time is kept by the refs on the field. Hence, why refs often call for scoreboard operators to put time back on the clock (as they did at the end of this one, moving the clock from three seconds to six).

Schefter's discussion misses both of these points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Schefter skipped that part :lol:

Also, my understanding has always been that official game time is kept by the refs on the field. Hence, why refs often call for scoreboard operators to put time back on the clock (as they did at the end of this one, moving the clock from three seconds to six).

Schefter's discussion misses both of these points.

 

He's just a hater. that's all. lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...