Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam in the MVP conversation


Jangler

Recommended Posts

he should be... but Peyton's gonna run away with it barring some kind of epic Denver-collapse.

Even with a collapse Peyton gets the nod because there would be no possible way Peyton would be the cause of the collapse. Peyton should grow a bushy white beard and build a house in the sky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even with a collapse Peyton gets the nod because there would be no possible way Peyton would be the cause of the collapse. Peyton should grow a bushy white beard and build a house in the sky.

 

haha true, Andrew Luck really is Manning's heir apparent...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the conversation yes... But as long as Peyton Manning is in the League Cam will not win this award.

Peyton had 7 TDs in week 1

Is Cam our MVP? Yes... But he's got no shot at really winning it this year

 

agreed, Cam will have to have one hell of a December to come close to win it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cams case would be a lot stronger if he didn't have those random back foot interceptions.

 

He Probably is more valuable to our team than Peyton is to Denver IMO because even Denver won a playoff game with some you know who at the helm....

 

Take Cam off this team and we would suck even with this defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cams case would be a lot stronger if he didn't have those random back foot interceptions.

 

He Probably is more valuable to our team than Peyton is to Denver IMO because even Denver won a playoff game with some you know who at the helm....

 

Take Cam off this team and we would suck even with this defense.

Take Cam off this team, and you have the Jets (a good defense, with no offense or QB)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...