Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Children Shown X-Rated Trailer Before The Movie Frozen


chknwing

Recommended Posts

A Florida movie theater that was supposed to play the delightful animated film "Frozen" accidentally showed the paying crowd pornography instead, possibly in the form of the red-band trailer for Lars Von Trier's likely NC-17 film, "Nymphomaniac."

According to Fox 13, the mistake"caused some parents to rush their children to the exits." Despite the sprinting parents running out of the theater, the nymphomania reportedly continued for a full two minutes.

"It seemed like forever when you're trying to, you know, cover a little guy's eyes," parent Lynee Greene said. "I didn't have enough hands to cover his ears too and he got the sound down real good."

Apparently the whole debacle began when the film wouldn't play, so the projectionist began playing filler, beginning with "Steamboat Willie" and ending with Shia LaBeouf literally having sex on-screen. Or maybe not.

The original Fox report makes no mention of "Nymphomaniac," but one tipster told Mosh News that it was Von Trier's explicit new film. That notion was questioned, however, by "Nymphomaniac" U.S. distributor, Magnolia Pictures, which told TheWrap that the red-band trailer for "Nymphomaniac," which features a scene of oral sex, was not sent to theaters.

“If the Gawker 'Frozen' story is true, it would’ve had to been uploaded from the internet and repurposed by a particularly twisted projectionist,” a Magnolia representative told TheWrap.

The movie theater issued an apology to "Frozen" attendees, and offered them free theater tickets.

 

 

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/03/frozen-porn_n_4379811.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003

 

All I can say is, just wow sick people in this world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the motherland, my best friend and I were watching cartoons on national tv and all of the sudden pron movie came on for good 3 minutes. I think that when I discovered my first bonner.

 

I read every one of your posts in a Russian accent.  No lie.  It's awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...