Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Conservative playcalling from Ron and Shula cost us this game.


IGSaint

Recommended Posts

Shula simply doesn't know how to play vs. the 3-4. Zona (6 pts) SF (10 pts) NO (13 pts; 7 in garbage time)

You could easily argue Shula's play calling should of had us 20 pts at halftime against AZ......

Players have to make plays too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rolling Cam out on design has been a train wreck this year.....why do people want more of a play that isn't working

Our issues can't be fixed in season. Shula is working around them the best he can and doing a solid job. We have talent issues on O

 

Cam rolled out and got a td to smitty. It may have been more of a scramble but still I think it could work if we practiced it more. I seem to remember a lot of cam rolling out of the pocket for lafell or smith to make a clutch grab too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were just bad all around tonight. At least, after Lafell's big drop early in the game. That drop started the spiral. Before that? Two solid drives that unfortunately stalled and only resulted in FGs, but we were moving. And Ginn was a dirty tackle away from a punt return TD. Defense was playing well.


After that drop, the whole team deflated. Defense stopped playing it seemed and the offense couldn't get poo going (that's on both the players and coaches).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam rolled out and got a td to smitty. It may have been more of a scramble but still I think it could work if we practiced it more. I seem to remember a lot of cam rolling out of the pocket for lafell or smith to make a clutch grab too.

That is why I said by design. Design rollouts have been horrific.

It basically takes away half the field.....why limit your options when you don't have great WRs or protection to begin with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can all argue things that should HAVE happened.

But reality is that we get shut down vs the 34

Well....it deserves to be mentioned when you peg it all on Shula. Dropped TD passes, dropped EASY 4th downs in scoring positions, easy 10+ yard gains dropped, etc. Shula had a great first half against AZ.....gotta be fair when bashing him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well....it deserves to be mentioned when you peg it all on Shula. Dropped TD passes, dropped EASY 4th downs in scoring positions, easy 10+ yard gains dropped, etc. Shula had a great first half against AZ.....gotta be fair when bashing him

and we looked completely helpless when they turned up the pressure. I know Bell will always look helpless, but they were killing our whole line that game. I know AZ has a great LB corps, but that game was ridiculous

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Game basically came down to 1 quarter of play......we got embarrassed in the 2nd q. That was basically the game. One quarter of bad football.....

So, we laid an egg in one quarter. In NO, in prime time......that happens. We move on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and we looked completely helpless when they turned up the pressure. I know Bell will always look helpless, but they were killing our whole line that game. I know AZ has a great LB corps, but that game was ridiculous

For one half....

And tonight, we got beat in one quarter....

That's football sometimes....

Shula isn't the issue. He is limited in what he can do....we don't have a good OL, WRs or good rush attack aiding his QB. That is all stuff he works around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...