Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question about the TV coverage for the Jets game


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

Compared to all the soccer broadcasts here in Germany, any NFL broadcast is like heaven. But to answer the question, I thought they did a nice job. I like CBS, even though I ain't mind the Fox guys either. They brought us 'Donald' ;-). I really like Aikman on Fox and Gruden on MNF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that was CBS's number 2 crew. It feels like Dan is 80 because he went straight from football into the booth, he's been doing games for 30 years. I like Dan but he's funny because he basically repeats exactly what your eyes see. He doesn't add anything unexpected or insightful. If Captain makes a play : "and Captain Munneryln makes a nice play, he ran up and made the tackle".

 

The picture quality on CBS is better, they broadcast in 1080i compared to Fox's 720p. They usually are more consistent with number of cameras too. Fox goes real low budget on games with no hype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The picture quality on CBS is better, they broadcast in 1080i compared to Fox's 720p. They usually are more consistent with number of cameras too. Fox goes real low budget on games with no hype.

 

And, you do know that the cameras the networks use, the number & where they are, affects any replays there will be during the game. The officials are pretty much limited to what the tv network provides. I've seen some of our games where there weren't the camera angles or even shots needed to overturn or confirm a challenged call. If Godell wants to create more rules, he should consider one to make the network camera work consistent game to game. Sadly, college games are in even worse shape with the camera work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox brought us Chad Pennington and Torry Holt the man who never finishes his.......

I think that was CBS's number 2 crew. It feels like Dan is 80 because he went straight from football into the booth, he's been doing games for 30 years. I like Dan but he's funny because he basically repeats exactly what your eyes see. He doesn't add anything unexpected or insightful. If Captain makes a play : "and Captain Munneryln makes a nice play, he ran up and made the tackle".

The picture quality on CBS is better, they broadcast in 1080i compared to Fox's 720p. They usually are more consistent with number of cameras too. Fox goes real low budget on games with no hype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that was CBS's number 2 crew. It feels like Dan is 80 because he went straight from football into the booth, he's been doing games for 30 years. I like Dan but he's funny because he basically repeats exactly what your eyes see. He doesn't add anything unexpected or insightful. If Captain makes a play : "and Captain Munneryln makes a nice play, he ran up and made the tackle".

The picture quality on CBS is better, they broadcast in 1080i compared to Fox's 720p. They usually are more consistent with number of cameras too. Fox goes real low budget on games with no hype.

Yep!!! CBS has a dark richer picture even to other networks who broadcast in 1080i... ESPN's picture on the other hand is too bright.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...