Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL.com's QB Index


tiger7_88

Recommended Posts

Rosenthal just can't give up on his Luck love (though he's good at giving Cam the credit he is due)...

 

 

 

The next generation is coming. Russell Wilson,Andrew Luck and Ryan Tannehill all progressed.Cam Newton "matured," which is media translation for his defense getting better (Newton never was exactly a problem). Nick Foles came out of nowhere to bolster the 2012 rookie class.

 

 

 

Next level

 

5. Ben Roethlisberger (6) 

6. Russell Wilson (8)

7. Andrew Luck (6) 

8. Cam Newton (14) 

9. Nick Foles (N/A) 

 

 

 

 

Let me see here... Cam has a higher QB rating than Luck?

 

Check.

 

Cam has a higher yards per attempt than Luck? 

 

Check.

 

Cam has more TDs scored than Luck?

 

Check.

 

And (using last years NFL "expert" criteria) Cam has more "wins" than Luck?

 

Check.

 

And, just guessing here (and using yet another of last year's NFL "expert" criteria), but I think Cam has more "clutch" "comeback" wins this year than Luck?

 

But Luck is the better QB?

 

OK.

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000304038/article/quarterback-index-yearend-rankings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rosenthal just can't give up on his Luck love (though he's good at giving Cam the credit he is due)...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let me see here... Cam has a higher QB rating than Luck?

 

Check.

 

Cam has a higher yards per attempt than Luck? 

 

Check.

 

Cam has more TDs scored than Luck?

 

Check.

 

And (using last years NFL "expert" criteria) Cam has more "wins" than Luck?

 

Check.

 

And, just guessing here (and using yet another of last year's NFL "expert" criteria), but I think Cam has more "clutch" "comeback" wins this year than Luck?

 

But Luck is the better QB?

 

OK.

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000304038/article/quarterback-index-yearend-rankings

 

People are so ingrained with the thought of Luck being the one that they can't fathom anything less 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't this the same fool that rated Kaepernick and RG3 higher than Cam last year (and said he looked at Cam's Rookie season as well), by claiming they were more accurate than Cam (not taking in account the systems they played in)?

 

I remember, I vociferously disagreed with him (if it was truly him), cause I knew neither Kaepernick or RG3 were legitimate pocket QB's, especially compared to Cam. And now everyone knows this. 

 

And Luck has done nothing this year (at least compared to Cam's situation), while playing in a weak division, which pads his wins stats, even though they did win a few nice games. But nobody's afraid of Indianapolis. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck is really good....I dunno why some of y'all can't get over that.

 

You're missing the point. No one in this thread is saying luck sucks. However every measurable category says cam is better than luck but these "experts" can't stop picking luck over cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they're that similar as passers at all.  Luck is definitely more consistent with his accuracy, but he doesn't have Cam's arm.  Luck is still the more polished pocket passer at this point.  The biggest issue both guys have right now is a weak WR corps.

Disagree with this whole heartedly. 

 

Luck's neither very accurate, and certainly not consistently accurate, or even assuredly a better pocket passer than Cam (though he's good), comparatively speaking. 

 

Have you watched him play regularly, or are you going off perception, pre-draft, or what media tells you?

 

They're very similar already, with Cam having far more upside potential. 

 

And I like, am a fan of Luck. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rosenthal just can't give up on his Luck love (though he's good at giving Cam the credit he is due)...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let me see here... Cam has a higher QB rating than Luck?

 

Check.

 

Cam has a higher yards per attempt than Luck? 

 

Check.

 

Cam has more TDs scored than Luck?

 

Check.

 

And (using last years NFL "expert" criteria) Cam has more "wins" than Luck?

 

Check.

 

And, just guessing here (and using yet another of last year's NFL "expert" criteria), but I think Cam has more "clutch" "comeback" wins this year than Luck?

 

But Luck is the better QB?

 

OK.

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000304038/article/quarterback-index-yearend-rankings

 

How did Russell Wilson, go up, when his team lost this week, and he's been playing poorly the past month?

 

Is it cause, they're the only team with 3 losses still, out of the "next line" QB's mentioned.

 

And how was Cam #14 previously? Is it because, the NFL media, finally got a chance to see Cam operate during the end of that game vs New Orleans (and therefore should have been higher to begin with, if they were actually watching his games)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disagree with this whole heartedly. 

 

Luck's neither very accurate, and certainly not consistently accurate, or even assuredly a better pocket passer than Cam (though he's good), comparatively speaking. 

 

Have you watched him play regularly, or are you going off perception, pre-draft, or what media tells you?

 

They're very similar already, with Cam having far more upside potential. 

 

And I like, and am a fan of Luck. 

 

I've watched 5-6 of his games and stand by what I said.  I think both franchises are very happy with their QBs.  I'm glad we have Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...