Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade and other roster moves


cavic7585

Recommended Posts

The two guys that are "untouchable" are Kemba and MKG. That said, a Godfather offer and both are movable. 

 

Jefferson isn't going anywhere because of his contract, and Zeller would carry no value close to his drafted position. Biz is Biz, and wouldn't carry much value. 

 

Gordon's contract and 1st rounders are the only real pieces to trade with IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bynum has been put on the shelf in Cleveland for "actions detrimental to team." They are trying to move him bad now before they are tied to the rest of his contract. I don't think we would be up for him, but maybe third wheel.

 

Z-bo is aparently on the block as well. If we could swing it for Z-bo and Jefferson to be down low, it would be incredible. But we would have to abandon the 'building' scenario and be all for 'win-now'. Z-bo is as old as Brendan Haywood- WHAT!?!?!?

 

Waiters is still on my radar as well as Derozen.

 

iwe need to upgrade the SF position badly. MKG isn't going to come back and drop 15 pts a game, but thats what we need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bynum has been put on the shelf in Cleveland for "actions detrimental to team." They are trying to move him bad now before they are tied to the rest of his contract. I don't think we would be up for him, but maybe third wheel.

 

Z-bo is aparently on the block as well. If we could swing it for Z-bo and Jefferson to be down low, it would be incredible. But we would have to abandon the 'building' scenario and be all for 'win-now'. Z-bo is as old as Brendan Haywood- WHAT!?!?!?

 

Waiters is still on my radar as well as Derozen.

 

iwe need to upgrade the SF position badly. MKG isn't going to come back and drop 15 pts a game, but thats what we need.

Do not want Bynum.

 

It's fun to watch z-bo maul. 50/50 on him because like you said, hes not the youngest guy.

 

Cleveland wants to ship Waiters, I think our coaching staff could help develop him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
    • If hypothetically, Ickey comes fully healthy, would he be willing to give up left tackle money for left guard money? In the Panthers case, moving Ickey LG or RT would be in our best interest and as it gives us our best starting offensive lineman combination. However, Im sure there's another team that would be desperate and willing to dish out top dollars for Ickey to have him come play left tackle for them. In that case, Ickey would just leave for that team instead.
×
×
  • Create New...