Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2014 UFA WR


SauceBoss

Recommended Posts

I'd take Nicks and his zero TD catches over Maclin coming off a season ending injury ALL DAY.

In all honesty, there's not much veteran options. Boldin won't be worth what he wants at his age. He'll probably end up back in Arizona or something. Decker would be good, but we need a possession wide receiver, not another slot WR we won't use. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would consider Nicks if the money is right. Other than that those guys aren't worth much. In my opinion James Jones and Eric Decker are a product of their QB. They will get paid but their numbers will go down. I would resign Donald Lafell if the money is right and draft a future number 1.

 

Cant say that about Decker. He was doing as good before Manning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoever we bring in will need to be at a good price, so the high end WR's are just not gonna make it here.  Decker will get paid well by someone like Indianapolis.  We'll be in the mix for a mid-range guy like Nicks, and Maclin wouldn't be bad either, but no one knows what he brings after the injury.  My guess is he'll get a 1 year deal in philly to reprove his worth.  We're in the market, but we're not gonna shell out tons of money for a FA WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...