Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"At Least We're Not..."


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

If we were the Lions, you could say you would be excited by the hire?

Caldwell is an average coach. If he was a GREAT coach, do you think Irsay would've fired him after purposely tanking? Caldwell benefited from having the greatest QB of all-time and inheriting an already constructed and established winning team.

And the Ravens offense didnt change a lot other than Caldwell sitting back and letting Flacco have more say in what the philosophy and calls would be, IIRC. The problem was Cameron was having a power struggle and ego battle with Flacco, so they fired him and brought in Caldwell to get back to what they were doing before the issues came up with Cameron (aka more Rice, with some deep shots sprinkled in). That's not to say that Caldwell isn't a good coordinator, he just hasn't proven to be a good head coach to this point, and Stafford is no Peyton Manning... maybe not even a Flacco. So, he has his work cut out for him.

 

Not saying Caldwell is or is not a good coach, but Jim Irsay isn't exactly the sharpest tool in the shed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we were the Lions, you could say you would be excited by the hire?

Caldwell is an average coach. If he was a GREAT coach, do you think Irsay would've fired him after purposely tanking? Caldwell benefited from having the greatest QB of all-time and inheriting an already constructed and established winning team.

And the Ravens offense didnt change a lot other than Caldwell sitting back and letting Flacco have more say in what the philosophy and calls would be, IIRC. The problem was Cameron was having a power struggle and ego battle with Flacco, so they fired him and brought in Caldwell to get back to what they were doing before the issues came up with Cameron (aka more Rice, with some deep shots sprinkled in). That's not to say that Caldwell isn't a good coordinator, he just hasn't proven to be a good head coach to this point, and Stafford is no Peyton Manning... maybe not even a Flacco. So, he has his work cut out for him.

 

The Lions went hard after Tony Dungy and, as Tony Dungy has been doing for several years, he respectfully turns down the job because he doesn't want to coach anymore. But what Tony Dingy does do is consult for numerous teams searching for head coaches. In the meantime, Ken Whisenhunt was the Lions top priority, but Whis quickly opted for the Titans when they paid him like he was the next Belicheck.

 

The Lions then asked Dungy who they should focus on- he said Jim Caldwell. I heard this morning Peyton Manning even gave Caldwell an endorsement.

 

Make no mistake, I think the Lions are loaded and could easily win that division, but they lack the overall discipline and maturity that Schwartz failed to bring. They need a no-nonsense, drill sergeant type coach like a Tom Coughlin, and that's what they're getting in Jim Caldwell. Don't assume because of Caldwell's quiet, non-eruptive demeanor that's he's not a tough coach- he is. Just because he doesn't roam the sidelines like a Bill Cowher or either of the Harbughs doesn't mean he's not intense and driven.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we were the Lions, you could say you would be excited by the hire?

Caldwell is an average coach. If he was a GREAT coach, do you think Irsay would've fired him after purposely tanking? Caldwell benefited from having the greatest QB of all-time and inheriting an already constructed and established winning team.

And the Ravens offense didnt change a lot other than Caldwell sitting back and letting Flacco have more say in what the philosophy and calls would be, IIRC. The problem was Cameron was having a power struggle and ego battle with Flacco, so they fired him and brought in Caldwell to get back to what they were doing before the issues came up with Cameron (aka more Rice, with some deep shots sprinkled in). That's not to say that Caldwell isn't a good coordinator, he just hasn't proven to be a good head coach to this point, and Stafford is no Peyton Manning... maybe not even a Flacco. So, he has his work cut out for him.

 

I wouldn't be excited but its what that team needs. he will bring discipline to that team which is the real reason they didn't make the playoffs. Irsay learned from his mistake with peyton and wanted a defensive minded coach. I was a colts/manning  supporter for years so I know. Caldwell is exactly what the Lions need. exciting hires aren't always the best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Lions went hard after Tony Dungy and, as Tony Dungy has been doing for several years, he respectfully turns down the job because he doesn't want to coach anymore. But what Tony Dingy does do is consult for numerous teams searching for head coaches. In the meantime, Ken Whisenhunt was the Lions top priority, but Whis quickly opted for the Titans when they paid him like he was the next Belicheck.

The Lions then asked Dungy who they should focus on- he said Jim Caldwell. I heard this morning Peyton Manning even gave Caldwell an endorsement.

Make no mistake, I think the Lions are loaded and could easily win that division, but they lack the overall discipline and maturity that Schwartz failed to bring. They need a no-nonsense, drill sergeant type coach like a Tom Coughlin, and that's what they're getting in Jim Caldwell. Don't assume because of Caldwell's quiet, non-eruptive demeanor that's he's not a tough coach- he is. Just because he doesn't roam the sidelines like a Bill Cowher or either of the Harbughs doesn't mean he's not intense and driven.

Good points. I'm just saying imo, that is one of the least exciting hires that could've been made becsuse there are far more questions about him as a head coach than there are answers - mostly because of Peyton and him inheriting winning teams from Dungy.

Just like I'm sure we all know Foxy is far from the biggest reason that the Broncos have had two consecutive wildly successful seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good points. I'm just saying imo, that is one of the least exciting hires that could've been made becsuse there are far more questions about him as a head coach than there are answers - mostly because of Peyton and him inheriting winning teams from Dungy.

Just like I'm sure we all know Foxy is far from the biggest reason that the Broncos have had two consecutive wildly successful seasons.

 

True, and I understand what you're saying as should all Panther fans. After all, how exciting have any of the Panther head coach hires ever been?

Capers? Seifert? Fox? Rivera?   Really? All of these guys are a direct reflection of the Jerry Richardson demeanor on the sideline.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Caldwell took over at offensive coordinator mid season and the Ravens won the Super Bowl the next season.

What happened with the Colts wasn't his fault. He won a Super Bowl with them as an assistant head coach, took them to another Super Bowl in his first season as head coach.

It's a damn good hire in my eyes

And then what happened this season?

And what happened after he took the Colts to the Super Bowl the year after Dungie? The team fell apart, even with Manning.

Caldwell is a terrible head coach, a terrible play caller, and a terrible motivator. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even a joke, I'm so glad we're not the 49ers, with a classless, arrogant head coach and an insufferable douche of a quarterback. We might have come short this time but our coach humbly goes to his own players and other coaches seeking ways to improve and then acting on it rather than styling himself as God's gift to the NFL, and our quarterback is more concerned about winning on the field than any petty personal vendettas with other quarterbacks, takes the burden of leadership willingly and is willing to respond to criticism with hard work and a smile rather than pandering through social media.

 

LOL...please kindly remove your face from Cams anus and take a second look at what you said from a non-crack sniffing perspective. Cam is our QB and all, but the sheer (how can I say this)..umm...stupidness does not do justice to that post count (well perhaops it doesnt considering the posts around here)

 

 

No more need to be bitter at the 49'ers. Yeah their couch us a d-bag...and yeah their qb made fun of ours...but so what? We would be far worse for wanting to be a team like that. Ifg i am recalling the DG presser correctly, SF and Seattle are the types of teams we will be modeling ourselves behind. I know people are still bitter, but lets give credit where credit is due and not degrade ourselves to middle school "your team msucks and this is why" crap.

 

 

Edit: im drunk so forgive me :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we were the Lions, you could say you would be excited by the hire?

Caldwell is an average coach. If he was a GREAT coach, do you think Irsay would've fired him after purposely tanking? Caldwell benefited from having the greatest QB of all-time and inheriting an already constructed and established winning team.

And the Ravens offense didnt change a lot other than Caldwell sitting back and letting Flacco have more say in what the philosophy and calls would be, IIRC. The problem was Cameron was having a power struggle and ego battle with Flacco, so they fired him and brought in Caldwell to get back to what they were doing before the issues came up with Cameron (aka more Rice, with some deep shots sprinkled in). That's not to say that Caldwell isn't a good coordinator, he just hasn't proven to be a good head coach to this point, and Stafford is no Peyton Manning... maybe not even a Flacco. So, he has his work cut out for him.

I'm sure if they win their division next year go deep in the playoffs you'll probably say he inherits a great team with Megatron and all he needed was a couple of pieces. Well, for the sake of your future argument, every team is a good draft away from becoming a contender. After all, every team get to add more than 7 players to their roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Redskins. If we were the redskins, I wouldn't be able to laugh at almost my entire family all damn day long about their three wins, their shitty QB and their never ending staff woes. They simply have no future and it's hilarious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...