Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You Better Get To Know "CALVIN PRYOR"!

carolina-chuck

By carolina-chuck,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

ajax4132 Newbie

ajax4132

Posted
Posted

As a Louisville Cardinal I love Pryor, but I just don't think he feels a huge need for us in the draft. And that REALLY hurts to admit, because I have a man-crush on the guy. Great football player.

Pryor would fit a need. Our back end would be monstrous

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted

Pryor will most likely be gone by 28. Loston may be around in time for our second pick. Although almost identical size, Pryor plays alot bigger. But like Pryor, Loston would hit his own mother if she came flying across the middle.

Worst case scenario Pryor falls to the Saints. Vaccaro and Pryor would be a pretty good "do it all" combo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Pryor will most likely be gone by 28. Loston may be around in time for our second pick. Although almost identical size, Pryor plays alot bigger. But like Pryor, Loston would hit his own mother if she came flying across the middle.

Worst case scenario Pryor falls to the Saints. Vaccaro and Pryor would be a pretty good "do it all" combo.

Yea, I agree.

Big fan of Loston too.

Saw a mock that has Pryor to the Aints. Still hasnt fix the hole I left in the wall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted

Yea, I agree.

Big fan of Loston too.

Saw a mock that has Pryor to the Aints. Still hasnt fix the hole I left in the wall.

Ha, we probably saw the same mock. Wasn't until I saw that mock did I realize how much that would suck.

Been working on a mock the last couple days and Loston is someone I'm wanted to put in it but having a hard time. Regardless of what mocks are saying right now if Moncrief is there in the second he'll be BPA imo. If Gettleman truly believes in value and bpa, we could easily end up double dipping at WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ha, we probably saw the same mock. Wasn't until I saw that mock did I realize how much that would suck.

Been working on a mock the last couple days and Loston is someone I'm wanted to put in it but having a hard time. Regardless of what mocks are saying right now if Moncrief is there in the second he'll be BPA imo. If Gettleman truly believes in value and bpa, we could easily end up double dipping at WR.

Hell yea!

Going BPA would mean that we double dip at WR. Theres going to be so much value left at WR when our 2nd pick start clicking.

If we dont double dip at WR, that would mean that Gman is adressing "needs" instead of BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Moonraker
      Canales is holding us back

      By Moonraker · Posted

      I've seen enough tape review to see that we run crossers...we have dudes in the middle of the field. I have to think that this is a harder area for someone of Bryce's stature to hit. You have to see directly over the center of the line and is probably where the most interceptions happen (he has thrown a LOT of his picks by not seeing a dude in the middle of the field).
    • GoobyPls
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By GoobyPls · Posted

      I’m pretty sure we did end up getting the first in that drive, but I don’t remember. It was obviously a catch the ball didn’t move 
    • hepcat
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By hepcat · Posted

      While I don't think NFL games are fully rigged, it's certainly closer to a scripted outcome than we all think. The NFL by their own admission in court is not a fair and balanced sporting event. It is a managed entertainment product, a "spectacle" as they've put it, that now has sports betting as a huge financial pillar of their business model. It's ridicuously naive to still think the NFL isn't using referees to manage the games towards certain outcomes, using "replays in the booth" and overturning calls, choosing to overlook penalties at critical moments and calling questionable and sometimes phantom game changing penalties at other critical junctures of games. The NFL has always done this going as far back as the '60s, and they were investigated by the FBI in the '70s which found a large number of ownership groups had ties to the mob. So when the overwhelming majority of the moneyline bets were on the Panthers vs the Saints last week, and suddenly we see some strange and ticky tack penalties we've rarely seen called on the Panthers all year, I just know there's more going on behind the scenes. And suddenly next week, the Panthers will probably be nudged to a win, to keep the NFC South race interesting, as I see the Bucs are the favorite as of now and most moneyline bets will trend towards the Bucs until during the game when the Bucs are leading heading into the 4th quarter, and the Panthers are nudged to a win. At least, that's what the NFL and Vegas probably want to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...