Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Feldman of CBS Sports "Leery" of Boom-or-Bust Benjamin per rotoworld


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Not saying that Bruce Feldman is any different than any other analyst, in that he has opinions like everyone else, but he presumably knows more about football than many. Perhaps he doesn't know what the hell he is talking about. Or, maybe he had the balls to say what many are already thinking and just don't have the stones to say. At the end of the day, he has stepped out on a limb (so-to-speak) by referring to Kevin Benjamin as the biggest "boom-or-bust" WR of his draft class. To that, I say "Ouch!"  At the same time, it does give me even more pause than I already had about us making Benjamin our 28th pick.  

 

 

Per Rotoworld:

 

CBS Sports' Bruce Feldman believes FSU's Kelvin Benjamin is more boom-or-bust than any other WR in the class.
"Benjamin will make personnel folks' chins hit the floor when they first see him," Feldman writes. "Thing is, he's even more raw than Evans and it took him a while to get a sense of FSU's routes/offense and he seems like more of a project." Feldman adds this would make him leery of Benjamin. The massive wideout will be 23 in February and slowly progressed before bursting out in his final season. He still has inconsistencies at the catch point and had a drop rate of over nine percent
 
Here is Feldman's original piece if anyone is interested. It actually is a response to a question about ranking some of the receivers, assuming that Watkins is off the table. One spoiler is that he is very high on Mike Evans, perhaps even higher than Watkins.
 
Anyway, getting back to Benjamin, the more I hear about the young man, the more I just don't think that he'll be our first pick.  The way that Dave Gettleman talks, I don't know that any WR will be our first pick. Gettleman has already thrown a little shade on the idea of picking WRs in the first round if you listen to his responses regarding draft philosophy. G-man pretty much believes that receivers don't usually come in making an immediate impact, so to think he is going to pick a receiver as raw as Benjamin in the first round is a bit of a stretch. Hell, it is a stretch.  Moreover, one thing that we know about Ron Rivera is that we always pretty much hit home runs with our first pick. We get players that are basically ready to play. I don't see Benjamin as that guy. He may not be a boom-or-bust guy in the end, but basically the way our FO moves, he won't be on our team to find out (because he'll be gone by #60),
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love me some Evans too. In my mind the best case scenario is he or ebron fall to us.

Gettleman never said he didnt like taking wr early. What he inferred is that if he does take one it's likely someone with a more advanced less raw game, ie they can run all the routes well. I could see that meaning someone like Landry, who I also like a lot. Gettleman said picks need to contribute early for a team to be successfull and this picking a raw wr doesn't help with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been saying this about Benjamin.  The system they run helps make him look good, not to mention, having someone like Jameis Winston throwing you the ball makes you look better than you are.  On the flip side, this is the same reason I like Jordan Matthews.  1400 yards against SEC defenses playing for VANDY...are you kidding?  Add that he's got the pedegree and the work ethic, and that's the kind of guy I'd love at #28.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been saying this about Benjamin.  The system they run helps make him look good, not to mention, having someone like Jameis Winston throwing you the ball makes you look better than you are.  On the flip side, this is the same reason I like Jordan Matthews.  1400 yards against SEC defenses playing for VANDY...are you kidding?  Add that he's got the pedegree and the work ethic, and that's the kind of guy I'd love at #28.

.....matthews again drops alot of balls and half of his passes are screens. He doesn't have the upside of benjamin nor the freakish athletic ability struggled to separate at senior bowl as well. Playing in the sec means nothing if ur the only wr your team has and you throw him a billion screen passes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been souring a bit on KB, poor hands, sluggish route running, lapses in concentration, not too mention he'll be 23 by the time hes drafted.

I think the poor hands and concentration are one and the same. The guy just needs a little bit of coaching. I've watched him from his freshman year until now and he's done nothing but improve. KB is your guy if he's there. He may be boom or bust but at the end of the first round those are the kinds of talents that if you wiff you wiff on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...