Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would A running focus team be a bad thing?


xclr82xtc

Recommended Posts

We were a run first team in 2011 too, just our running game was better and we were more explosive when we did pass, which is the way it should be IMO. Not run, 3 yard out route, screen pass off a draw, repeat. I know we probably can't get back to that this year b/c of our receiving corp (or lack thereof) and o-line, but fug all this Cam being a "game manager" stuff. It's entirely possible to grind it out on the ground, pass vertically and still limit turnovers, etc. That should be what we're aiming for...middle ground between Chudball "mad-scientist-read-option-shotgun-base-formation" and Shulaball dink n dunk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn't ask for a better way to break-in a new offensive unit, than to have a run-heavy offense. This will help instill the importance of blocking and route-running which will go a long way in forming a solid foundation for our receivers to build upon as a unit. Do the little things right, paying attention to detail and execution of each play and go make a play.

This could be the season of Hurney's swan song as we finally get returns on all the money spent towards the rushing attack. There won't be a more important season, than this one, for building our offense for the future of this franchise. If we can generate 3000 yards on the ground, we will be a very successful team and if all our guys are healthy, there is no reason why we can't be the best rushing team in the league.

Once again, we play to take full advantage of our strengths and get to make the most out of our coaching philosophy...control the ball on offense and limit the opposition's scoring opportunities. A true team effort.

It sounds good anyway.

I am optimistic because we will be injecting rookies into the offense and rushing the ball effectively is easier and more natural than operating a complex passing attack. This will minimize the learning curve that our new players will go through and hopefully build confidence for when we open up the playbook.

Just what the doctor ordered for a rebuilt offensive unit and it will go a long way in teaching the young receiving corp the importance of downfield blocking and our team will benefit as a whole.

This really takes the pressure off of our young offensive players as they will be asked to work as a unit, rather than having to depend on them individually to constantly carry the offensive burden. There's not a better way to shatter confidence than to expect too much from a young playmaker and beat him up due to inexperience when he fails.

Can't wait for the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were a run first team in 2011 too, just our running game was better and we were more explosive when we did pass, which is the way it should be IMO. Not run, 3 yard out route, screen pass off a draw, repeat. I know we probably can't get back to that this year b/c of our receiving corp (or lack thereof) and o-line, but fug all this Cam being a "game manager" stuff. It's entirely possible to grind it out on the ground, pass vertically and still limit turnovers, etc. That should be what we're aiming for...middle ground between Chudball "mad-scientist-read-option-shotgun-base-formation" and Shulaball dink n dunk.

You are right. We don't really have much if a choice with this team. It will definitely be a baby steps kind of progression and I don't think that's a bad thing.

Who knows? This could be what Shula desperately needs because he runs such a conservative playbook. Keep It Simple Stupid rules the day. Build a strong rushing attack and open up the playbook off I that, we could see a renaissance here, in our young offensive unit, that we can progressively build from as our team matures and progresses. Lends to great overall balance and sustainability when there is a strong foundation in place.

What I love is that our team is so young, not just at this position or that position, but across the board. Our OL, receivers, defense...our Core is young and they are studs, not just talented, but truly effective leaders and that is pretty rare to have across an entire franchise. It's great because we will actually get to see the progression of this team through the weeks, months and years until it finally comes to fruition collectively.

We can replace pieces here and there and get young playmakers and fill out the roster with role-playing vets who have specialities that can be exploited and drawn upon to add wrinkles and schemes to the foundation. It's pretty exciting and it's the first time that I've seen our team with this strong and young of a core, without looking inexperienced or overwhelmed. It's a beautiful thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it will and I believe we will lean heavily on the run game and 2 TE set. We are getting younger at the OL position and Stewart will have a healthy off-season. Stewart is the feature back, Williams for change of pace, & Tolbert for short yardage & goal line.

I hate to admit it but you and several other posters are right we need a good strong run blocking tackle in the first round. We will not get our ideal #1 receiver in the first. We could get a good one but our line may not hold blocks long enough which could lead to turnovers and 3rd and longs.

We need to make sure our foundation is strong for this upcoming season and that will probably require a round1 offensive lineman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can only be a run first team when defenses fear your passing game. Otherwise they load the box and no one can run against 9 or 10 defenders. You have to have balance which makes you more effective.

I agree but you build balance first by having a strong line. If the offensive line is dominated on run and pass blocking Megaton and AP wouldn't do us any good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle did it last year with a horrible offensive line.

Seattle didn't have a horrible offensive line. Yeah, they were hit by injuries at one point in the season, plus their strength is run-blocking. That's what they look for in their linemen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...