Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would A running focus team be a bad thing?


xclr82xtc

Recommended Posts

We were a run first team in 2011 too, just our running game was better and we were more explosive when we did pass, which is the way it should be IMO. Not run, 3 yard out route, screen pass off a draw, repeat. I know we probably can't get back to that this year b/c of our receiving corp (or lack thereof) and o-line, but fug all this Cam being a "game manager" stuff. It's entirely possible to grind it out on the ground, pass vertically and still limit turnovers, etc. That should be what we're aiming for...middle ground between Chudball "mad-scientist-read-option-shotgun-base-formation" and Shulaball dink n dunk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn't ask for a better way to break-in a new offensive unit, than to have a run-heavy offense. This will help instill the importance of blocking and route-running which will go a long way in forming a solid foundation for our receivers to build upon as a unit. Do the little things right, paying attention to detail and execution of each play and go make a play.

This could be the season of Hurney's swan song as we finally get returns on all the money spent towards the rushing attack. There won't be a more important season, than this one, for building our offense for the future of this franchise. If we can generate 3000 yards on the ground, we will be a very successful team and if all our guys are healthy, there is no reason why we can't be the best rushing team in the league.

Once again, we play to take full advantage of our strengths and get to make the most out of our coaching philosophy...control the ball on offense and limit the opposition's scoring opportunities. A true team effort.

It sounds good anyway.

I am optimistic because we will be injecting rookies into the offense and rushing the ball effectively is easier and more natural than operating a complex passing attack. This will minimize the learning curve that our new players will go through and hopefully build confidence for when we open up the playbook.

Just what the doctor ordered for a rebuilt offensive unit and it will go a long way in teaching the young receiving corp the importance of downfield blocking and our team will benefit as a whole.

This really takes the pressure off of our young offensive players as they will be asked to work as a unit, rather than having to depend on them individually to constantly carry the offensive burden. There's not a better way to shatter confidence than to expect too much from a young playmaker and beat him up due to inexperience when he fails.

Can't wait for the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were a run first team in 2011 too, just our running game was better and we were more explosive when we did pass, which is the way it should be IMO. Not run, 3 yard out route, screen pass off a draw, repeat. I know we probably can't get back to that this year b/c of our receiving corp (or lack thereof) and o-line, but fug all this Cam being a "game manager" stuff. It's entirely possible to grind it out on the ground, pass vertically and still limit turnovers, etc. That should be what we're aiming for...middle ground between Chudball "mad-scientist-read-option-shotgun-base-formation" and Shulaball dink n dunk.

You are right. We don't really have much if a choice with this team. It will definitely be a baby steps kind of progression and I don't think that's a bad thing.

Who knows? This could be what Shula desperately needs because he runs such a conservative playbook. Keep It Simple Stupid rules the day. Build a strong rushing attack and open up the playbook off I that, we could see a renaissance here, in our young offensive unit, that we can progressively build from as our team matures and progresses. Lends to great overall balance and sustainability when there is a strong foundation in place.

What I love is that our team is so young, not just at this position or that position, but across the board. Our OL, receivers, defense...our Core is young and they are studs, not just talented, but truly effective leaders and that is pretty rare to have across an entire franchise. It's great because we will actually get to see the progression of this team through the weeks, months and years until it finally comes to fruition collectively.

We can replace pieces here and there and get young playmakers and fill out the roster with role-playing vets who have specialities that can be exploited and drawn upon to add wrinkles and schemes to the foundation. It's pretty exciting and it's the first time that I've seen our team with this strong and young of a core, without looking inexperienced or overwhelmed. It's a beautiful thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it will and I believe we will lean heavily on the run game and 2 TE set. We are getting younger at the OL position and Stewart will have a healthy off-season. Stewart is the feature back, Williams for change of pace, & Tolbert for short yardage & goal line.

I hate to admit it but you and several other posters are right we need a good strong run blocking tackle in the first round. We will not get our ideal #1 receiver in the first. We could get a good one but our line may not hold blocks long enough which could lead to turnovers and 3rd and longs.

We need to make sure our foundation is strong for this upcoming season and that will probably require a round1 offensive lineman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can only be a run first team when defenses fear your passing game. Otherwise they load the box and no one can run against 9 or 10 defenders. You have to have balance which makes you more effective.

I agree but you build balance first by having a strong line. If the offensive line is dominated on run and pass blocking Megaton and AP wouldn't do us any good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle did it last year with a horrible offensive line.

Seattle didn't have a horrible offensive line. Yeah, they were hit by injuries at one point in the season, plus their strength is run-blocking. That's what they look for in their linemen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...