Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Person & Jonathan Jones putting our receiving corp into (Rivera's) perspective


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Person and Jones give a statistical look at what the Panthers are ostensibly trying to do with their receiving corps, much to many of our chagrin.  Rivera talked about replacing the 10 catches  so matter-of-factly, or perhaps apologetically depending upon how you look at it.  The problem for many of us is that as opposed to just trying to replace production, we should be trying to increase or at least improve production.  And, yes, no one has forgotten about the draft.  G-man is not done, and I am still convinced that we are going to bring in at least a couple of more receivers (via draft or FA) to winnow out the wheat from the chaff.

 

I will give G-man and RIvera this: even at this moment, we may get some improvement just with the better hands alone. Of course, as always, a lot depends on the play calling.

 

In explaining how the Panthers would try to replace leading receiver Steve Smith, coach Ron Rivera said the Panthers wouldn't necessarily try to find a No. 1 receiver.

 

Instead, they would look to replace the 10 catches a game their four wide receivers -- all of whom are now gone -- combined for in 2013.

With the acquisition of free agent wideout Jason Avant on Monday, the Panthers are getting closer to Rivera's goal of 10. But they're not there, yet.

 

Avant and the two other recently signed wideouts -- Jerricho Cotchery and Tiquan Underwood -- combined for 7.25 receptions a game last season.

 

 

 

But without a true No. 1 receiver -- like Avant had in Philly in DeSean Jackson, Cotchery had in Antonio Brown, and Underwood had in Vincent Jackson -- one of those receivers is going to draw extra coverage.

 

The bottom line, the Panthers have brought in a proven group of complementary receivers, all of whom are said to be high-character guys who will help in the locker room and with the development of the young wideouts.

 

On statistics alone, it's hard to argue that Cotchery-Avant-Underwood is a better receiving lineup than Smith-Brandon LaFell-Ted Ginn Jr. 

 

 

Link

 

Check out the short article, Huddlers.

 

Person and Jones have put forth a very astute analysis and summation of the state of our receiving corps at the present moment, in my estimation.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't hate on Person, Jones or any of them.  Like I said in the other thread, it's not about breaking news in the world of Twitter, it's about saying something interesting or giving a different angle on news that has already broken.  I mean we're all reading pretty much the same crap and regurgitating the same core news anyway. Just be accurate and a little different.

 

I also don't mind writers getting ideas from the Internet---whether Twitter or not.  As writers, you have to get ideas from somewhere.  If someone else has some work out there, just give them their proper attribution and it's all good, but you don't get credit for tweeting an idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

teams may feel they dont need to have an extra guy double up on any wr and use that guy to spy Cam or just commit to the run.  we will see that safety in the box a lot.  did it really take two guys to come up with this info?

 

Gettleman ain't gonna let it go down like that. We will draft some play makers on offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gman and Rivera aren't trying to replace last year's WR nor are they looking for long term WR options from free agency.  They are trying to build a team from the draft, and fill in the gaps with cheap, replaceable parts from free agency.  That's what they are going to do year in and year out.  We'll be running lean for the first couple of seasons in this process, while we ride out crappy old contracts and have relatively high turnover rate.  Once we have a solid foundation complete, however, it's a matter of reloading with BPA every year and using free agency for depth.  That's how you build a dynasty, and that's exactly what they are doing.  You take a little pain the short term, if you can call 12-4 and division champions pain, but once you have the machine built it's just a matter of keeping it fueled.

 

This is why draft pundits saying we will take player x or y are full of crap.  We aren't drafting for need, we are drafting to building a strong foundation of the best players we can get.  We won't reach for a WR, because we don't need to reach for a WR.  We will take whoever is tops on our board when it comes to us, every time it comes to us.  It's exciting to see it happening, because we have a very, very bright future ahead of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this post here from this morning made the same point more concisely:

I guess between the 3 of them and Olsen, we can get our 12 catches a game, after all that's all they talked about when they cut Smitty. Gettleman: "Dont worry Panthers fans, all we need is 12 catches per game"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We still need to spend at least a 2nd Round pick on a WR.

 

I Don't Care what Gman says!!

 

We want to keep Cam long-term? Well give the man some weapons!

 

no we don't.  Want to keep Cam around?  Win.  Build a dynasty and win.  Make him believe that by staying here he will get rings.  Gman knows what the fug he's doing.  Finally, we have someone in our FO who knows what the fug they are doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no we don't. Want to keep Cam around? Win. Build a dynasty and win. Make him believe that by staying here he will get rings. Gman knows what the fug he's doing. Finally, we have someone in our FO who knows what the fug they are doing.

To keep Cam around we first have to keep him upright. All the talk about WR's, people forget the OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They oughta be more pissed about Coen lol bowles is old school with an aging defense and has lost two OCs  …. The fan base always wants the shiny toy.  
    • Please don't tell me you just averaged the QB ratings of all of Shough's starts to declare his QB rating as better 😂 I hope you don't actually believe that's how it works.  Otherwise please show your math on Shough's QB rating as a starter. Thanks for including Shough's 2.6 more Rushing YPG in this comparison, really doesn't feel at all like you're desperately grasping for as many straws as you can here. The truth is, it takes a statistical bottom-tier starting QB like Bryce Young to make Shough look simply OK by comparison.  And that bottom-tier starting QB still, by your own admission, puts up more points for his offense than Shough.  You're framing this as damning for Bryce, but in reality the fact that him and Bryce are so neck-and-neck is shining Shough in a very poor light. Yes Shough is a rookie and Young is a 3rd year starter, which is why I circle back to my position of Shough having a "pretty solid, encouraging rookie season" whereas you're fanboying over him.  Never mind that Shough is 2 years older than Bryce though.  Normally yes a QB's experience in the league is invaluable...but Bryce is kind of a unique situation considering the biggest complaint with him is he is too physically limited to succeed in the league.  Do we think a QB can overcome severe physical limitations simply with experience?  Also I remember wayyyy back (/s) when we cared so much about DJ Johnson being an older rookie and our standard for them being that they're more NFL-ready and able to contribute sooner rather than later.  But now all of a sudden Shough is just a poor little 26-year-old rookie on an awful team.  Seriously...the way you frame everything around Shough is straight out of a fanfic.  Constantly referencing with tears in your eyes how he's succeeding against all odds on such an awful team.  Meanwhile the Saints' D is 14th in PPG and their offense (led by Shough) is 29th in PPG.  Telling me how the Saints managed a win on Shough's shoulders against the Jets last week who put up...*checks notes*...6 points against the Saints' D.  Yes god bless the savior Shough who willed his team to victory against those juggernauts led by Brady Cook.  Never mind how Taysom Hill threw as many touchdowns in 1 passing attempt as Shough did in 49 passing attempts.  Yikes.
    • Who's gonna drop the gloves? I can't think of a single player on this team that can fight. Period. Much less get the best of an opposing player. Please.
×
×
  • Create New...