Do we really want to sit our starters...IF...

[panthersphan]

we win Sunday night?

I would like to see us at least start them and take them out early...

...sitting them essentially gives them 3 weeks off...and remember how we played after our bye week!?!?!

[carpanfan96]

no I don't think we would sit them for much at all, especially after how we came out of the bye week. probably play them for the first and second quarters

[panthersphan]

agreed...1 half...and the first drive of 2nd half....

::keep fingers crossed::

BEAT NY!!!

[Scutty]

If it's all academic I wouldn't want to risk them for too long during the course of a game so I'd go along with the brains trust above me

[Fright]

I think we let 'em play half a game or even less. No need in letting the Aints try and get dirty on us and try to hurt one of our main guys. Even if we do sit starters early, I like our chances of our 2nd team competing/beating the Aints still.

Mccown/Moore with Stewart in the backfield could probably look good throwing to Jarrett/Hackett/etc.

I don't think we'll be rusty w/ the extra rest either. If so, (given we win Sunday) we'll have the home field crowd to help us wake up a bit!

[Cyclonus]

I am not a fan of sitting starters late in the season. Assuming the Panthers win on Sunday, they'll already have a bye week. If they sit against the 'Aints, that will give them 2 weeks off. That would kill momentum. Look how long it took the Panthers to get their poo together after their bye in the regular season.

[scpanther22]

sit the WR get jarret in there.

[Jangler]

Ask again after Sunday night.

[Zaximus]

I don't think starts will sit, maybe DWill for Stewart quite a bit, but the people that WILL get a rest are people with nagging injuries that don't need to play, but could in a otherwise needed basis.