All Activity

What it really proves is you don't have to sell the future to go up to 1 to get a QB. Finding a QB with the tools and having a good coach/system in place makes more impact than draft rankings.

I don't either but usually when it's offered I should have ended up taking it. Watching this game I don't think La liga isn't any better than MLS

I never take the cash out unless I have two simultaneous bets going on opposite sides.

Carolina has a lot of needs they could draft for but hey lets swing for the fence and pickup a player that could be an impact player and play multiple roles. kenyon sadiq is that guy. dude is a beast. blocks like a lineman, runs like a running back and has hands like a receiver.

It's only a stupid stat if you're desperately clinging to the idea that the only way to find a SB caliber QB is in the top 5 of the draft. I get it, it hits some people right on the feels but it is what it is.

Fug that LOVE IT FOR SLAVIN

Has a Canes fan I felt sorry for Jarvy, the rest I enjoyed

Saka! Halfway home. 2 goals in soccer to me doesn't equate 20 points in basketball but early payout is great.

fug I was asleep!

It’s a stupid weird stat. Here’s some of the stuff that messes up: 1. It ignores the 3 SBs won since 2000 by QBs drafted before 2000. It also ignores the 8 SBs won by 1st rounders drafted outside the top 5. That’s 42% of the SB winners right there. 2. As you mentioned, the SB winner clause removes 8 top 5 lost SBs and 5 1st rounders drafted outside losses, which is 50% of all SBs since 2000. 3. You also have the SB for Nick Foles that absolutely gets and asterisk because top a top 5 Eagles draft pick was an MVP candidate at 11-2 with 33TDs. If Wentz doesn’t have that amazing season, the Eagles aren’t the #1 seed. It’s like the Hostetler SB win that ignores what Simms did. Foles doesn’t win that SB if he played the entire year. 4. Tom Brady won 23% of the SBs by himself and lost 3 of the 26. He’s the exception that proves the rule. The funny part is that outside of Brady, the list of SB winners and losers is basically 1st round QBs, including some traded guys.

Yeah, not sure why it's not reviewable for the corner. If he scored they would have given a good goal but because he didn't they don't review. Makes no sense. Also your cash out is a joke lol

Horrible offsides call to negate Saka's shot on goal.

Wow. That's amazing the book does that. Like I said, @PantherChris has been crushing that site. fuging Spurs answer right back. Bad for Arsenal, good for my over bet.

He was a much more complete player. That is development. I think this next year- year 3- is an important year for him. Also depends on how the offense uses him.

I like taking wingers because of the + money. At least a couple times a game they go selfish and try to go to frame instead of cross. Also bet365 has sub on play on so if he's subbed out it moves to the new player. It really is the best book

@toldozer moving soccer bet talk here, vs college hoops thread. Like Arsenal win, hoping Saka shot on goal came with some nice plus money. He plays so wide and as a set up man. Also possible he's subbed off for Madueke early in the second half.

I took arsenal win saka shot on target Villarreal win Mikautadze shot on target

I feel like they will. One thing about Dan, he has been aggressive.

Bro, its the internet, everyone is cranky. Arsenal / Spurs, over 2.5. Go Gunners!

Hahahaha. Loved the demeanor from the Canucks getting their medals!

Yeah. If you can’t get a Rams Wild Card level performance on a near weekly basis I don’t know why you keep doing it. There isn’t much there on those ‘off’ weeks. And then… is he really ‘off’ or that is the norm? With some shiny but unsustainable moments mixed in. We still don’t know.

I really hope they don't go nuts and do a bunch of restructuring

Congrats!

I won't post it in this so people don't get cranky but probably just one soccer play.