Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Big men allow you to compete"


Growl

Recommended Posts

Said Panthers general manager Dave Gettleman today, when talking about his early round selections.

""Big men allow you to compete, and we addressed that in the first (two) days. It's important that we have those people," Gettleman said"

Big men allow you to compete, Dave Gettleman said when talking about the WR position. This phrase has been spouted on this board as nausem in every argument against taking skill position players. Now that it has been discovered to be a myth that he is talking strictly about OL, if the pick itself wasn't evidence enough, perhaps this time next year discussions be a sliver more open minded when someone suggest we need a WR or CB. This also reveals something that we mostly knew anyways, that Gettleman prefers specimens and the days of irrational hate against massive talents because they are physically gifted as this board seems to so often do (Newton, Clowney, Benjamin) may lead to backfire, as the Benjamin pick was for so many posters.

Enjoy your evening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think people were leery of the Cam/Benjamin/Clowney picks because they were large people...

You're missing what I'm saying. People are leery of specimens. It is absolutely clockwork on our fair website. Huddles prefer undersized players who are "gritty" or "tough" and consistently brand athletes with ridiculous media drive stereotypes like "does he want it enough?" Or "what will he do when he gets the money?"

I have never seen a board that fears raw, natural talent as much as Panther fans do on this site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this board has been enamored (and rightly so) with steve smith for so long that we've almost come to accept small guys as the archetype for certain positions instead of the statistical anomaly and exception tot he rule that it actually is

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're missing what I'm saying. People are leery of specimens. It is absolutely clockwork on our fair website. Huddles prefer undersized players who are "gritty" or "tough" and consistently brand athletes with ridiculous media drive stereotypes like "does he want it enough?" Or "what will he do when he gets the money?"

I have never seen a board that fears raw, natural talent as much as Panther fans do on this site.

 

I guess I still don't understand. Again, no one was saying to draft a smaller QB than Cam. Or, not to draft Benjamin because he was a specimen. 

 

The knock against Cam was a) he was a one-year wonder b) did his game translate to the NFL (helped fueled by Gruden's QB Camp) and c) were there character concerns? He's aced every one of those.

 

The knock against Benjamin was, does he run routes? Hell, we still don't know that. In fact, Gettleman said the only receiver that did know the whole route tree was OBJ. Most of us were glad to get Benjamin, or, if not "glad", then definitely content with the pick. Also, it's hard to say, "draft someone smaller than Benjamin at WR" because, well, every WR is smaller than Benjamin. 

 

The knock on Clowney was, which Clowney are you getting? You can't honestly say that, if you watched ANY Clowney USC game, you came away impressed. Sure, he has size. But the dude didn't look like he gave a poo. I mean, honestly, just watch some of those games and you'll see Julius Peppers out there.

 

I don't think anyone here is leery of physically dominating players. I think people are leery of players because they have justifiable reason, even if you don't agree with that justifiable reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this board trends toward the unsexy picks because their football philosophy is just a graffiti wall of football clichés that got parroted down to them in the 1980s so they will always defer to low risk, low reward options. Don't pick that dual threat QB in the first round because that undrafted FA white guy with no athleticism will always have better fundamentals. Don't pass up that linebacker in the first because it's easy for me to quantify production at that position which basically for me is tackles and that's it and LBs are going to get tackles regardless. Don't air it out because running the ball for no gain is smarter/more gritty/not too exciting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went back and watched film on Benjamin, dude reminds me of AJ Green. Hes such a beast. I am 100% convinced if we had Benjamin last season we convert those missed redzone opportunities against the Cards and go 13-3.

 

uhh

 

how does he remind you of aj green other than they're both receivers....?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uhh

 

how does he remind you of aj green other than they're both receivers....?

 

neither are known for their speed, but still get open down field

both are great at jump balls

both are 6'4+

 

just a guess

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this board has been enamored (and rightly so) with steve smith for so long that we've almost come to accept small guys as the archetype for certain positions instead of the statistical anomaly and exception tot he rule that it actually is

Welcome to this ass backwards forum, where every 5'10'' or shorter WR prospect is the next steve smith and every 6'5'' receiver is the new Dwayne Jarrett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're missing what I'm saying. People are leery of specimens. It is absolutely clockwork on our fair website. Huddles prefer undersized players who are "gritty" or "tough" and consistently brand athletes with ridiculous media drive stereotypes like "does he want it enough?" Or "what will he do when he gets the money?"

I have never seen a board that fears raw, natural talent as much as Panther fans do on this site.

 

Maybe because these are words historically associated with some of the biggest NFL busts.  I was onboard with the Cam pick because he was an extreme talent at the most important position on the field and we were protected by the new rookie wage scale.  If we were gonna have to hand him a Sam Bradford type contract, I would've been scared out of my mind.

 

I'm not sure if KB applies here.  KB and Cam are similarly sized, but Cam outperformed him in every single test at the combine.  Cam is an elite athlete for his size.  KB is a very good athlete for his size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...