Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy 911 call


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://media.charlotteobserver.com/smedia/2014/05/14/17/29/d6dCY.So.138.mp3

 

aaaaaand here is the neighbors call.

Don't mean to make light of the situation, but the back and forth on this call is hilarious.

 

"Lemme finish the conversation please? You-know-whudImsayin?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your comprehension can be just terrible.

 

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24562492/woman-alleges-greg-hardy-threw-her-on-couch-covered-in-guns

 

In the Motion for Protective Order:

 

I begged them to let me go & I wouldn't tell anyone what he did. They took me out into the hall, pushed me down & went back inside the apartment. I crawled to the elevator and ran into [Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department].

 

 

 

Its gonna be easy as pie to prove/disprove that she was or was not in the apartment if she claims to have run into the police in the elevator.  Just ask the police.

 

Again, if she was out of the apartment, why did they need the police to get her out of the apartment?

 

Like I said, anyone who thinks anything has been cleared up in this issue is just looking for a chance to jump (for SOME REASON).

 

Yeah, yeah, I know... psycho bitch... Mike and Ikes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://media.charlotteobserver.com/smedia/2014/05/14/17/29/d6dCY.So.138.mp3

 

aaaaaand here is the neighbors call.

Also, the guy who calls is saying that the woman that keeps interrupting him changed her story about "seeing it" and then only "hearing it". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24562492/woman-alleges-greg-hardy-threw-her-on-couch-covered-in-guns

In the Motion for Protective Order:

Its gonna be easy as pie to prove/disprove that she was or was not in the apartment if she claims to have run into the police in the elevator. Just ask the police.

Again, if she was out of the apartment, why did they need the police to get her out of the apartment?

Like I said, anyone who thinks anything has been cleared up in this issue is just looking for a chance to jump (for SOME REASON).

Yeah, yeah, I know... psycho bitch... Mike and Ikes.

If he is telling her not to tell anyone, why call 911?

"You better not tell anyone about this!! Now... let me get the police up in here"

Defies logic.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah...I thought that too. 

 

 

They told her they called the police and she tried to leave before they got there, was what I was thinking.

 

 

You guys need to get your story straight.

 

She wouldn't leave the apartment, so they called the police.

 

She tried to leave, so they held her down and called the police.

 

She's a stupid psycho bitch on Mike and Ikes.

 

She's a genius, scheming tart who wants Hardy's money.

 

Roll the dice and pick your favorite, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like are boy Hardy did the right thing. Glad this came out.This kind of poo pisses me off about women & hardly ever any consequences come back from making false allegations.

To many men in America get falsely accused exactly like this especially if u have money from gold digging bitches. I have 8 sisters & respect women to the fullest, but laws need to be made to protect men from crazy ho's like this. No every female is not like this, but a lot are & until they start getting thrown in jail or charged this crap won't stop.

It's ridiculous when a man tries to do the right thing they still are guilty in the public eye because all anyone looks at is he assaulted a woman without any facts. Women bitch & moan about equal rights! It works both ways or it should, but in the legal system it doesn't. Hardy should be ok due to the 911 call which is great news & now I'm an even bigger fan.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Hardy says he video taped the whole thing? Let's see the video then..

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

I'd imagine that won't be public, but videotaping a situation was by far the best thing you can do in Hardy's position. If the video shows her doing as Hardy suggested then her case just went down the toilet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd imagine that won't be public, but videotaping a situation was by far the best thing you can do in Hardy's position. If the video shows her doing as Hardy suggested then her case just went down the toilet. 

 

 

Yep, video eliminates a lot of he said/she said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They addressed D in free agency in a big way (Edge, ILB) and they signed a starting OT and a player they think could be a swing OT in reserve.  They have claimed to be adding "Weapons" to the offense.  I think that will be their focus.  I agree 100% that we need a T, but a reserve, developmental OT in a weak (at the top) draft does little to address that weakness in 2026.  If they are telling the truth, a reserve developmental OT is not a weapon.  The will draft a WR if that statement and their actions in free agency are accurate.  That does not mean we ignore OT--I just dont see where he takes a T if he is filling holes. As a coach, I am concerned about OT, but when I look at the roster, I see bigger immediate problems. S: We are OK if you want Scott for another season. Not ideal.  There is also talk of Smith-Wade being moved to S.  If so, we need a CBN. DT: Who took Robinson's job?  He played a lot.  All DTs (NT-DE) were average to below average, including 280 lb wharton.  We need a DT (my preference for the first pick, to be honest)  I am guessing a DT will be our third rounder? ILB:  Unless we want Wallace out there in coverage, we need a compliment to Lloyd.  I think Lloyd's starting mate is the second rounder. (speculating)  This pick is likely to occur in the second round because it is for a starting position. WR:  Some are fine with what we have.  sIn 2025, Coker had 3  TDs on 394 yards.  Legette had 3 TDs and 363 yards--and only 1 drop.  I love Coker, but neither should make us feel secure about WR with those numbers.  A lot depends on both stepping up in 2026, but Canales has been screaming weapons.  Could he mean Tight end?  That depends on how good they feel about Coker and XL. Center:  You can get a player ready to start relatively early in the middle rounds.  Very similar to the OT situation but I think C may be more of a priority right now than OT.   Tight End:  They seem to like Delp from Georgia who projects round 4. CB:  There was some talk of moving Smith-Wade to S (to learn for a season with Scott, maybe?) and that might require adding CB depth inside. Tackle?:  I agree that we need one, but this draft is simply not strong at the top at T.  The ONLY way to get a quality OT that is still developmental is to take one in round 1.  Canales has all but said we are not doing that.  But after the first 40 picks or so, they pretty much level out for a good while.  The fifth rounders and the third rounders are about the same.  For that Reason, I am guessing (It is all guesses) that they 
    • Buffalo plays Dallas in the last game. But Dallas has nothing to play for.
×
×
  • Create New...