Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Protective order against Hardy dismissed


jamos14

Recommended Posts

Accuser, Nicole Holder did not show up to court.  Judge dismissed the protective order.

 

Apparently, she also switched attorneys from the one she had yesterday.

 

 

Goodwin said there were irreconcilable differences between he and his client. He is not sure if she has new representation.

 

 

Last time he withdrew from a case was 1996.  

 

 

My personal feelings is he doesn't want his reputation as an attorney sullied by an obvious lying.  Can't think of any other reason he would withdraw.

 

 

 

Things are getting more strange by the hour.

 

 

 

 

 

Info from Person twitter.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's civil not criminal.

 

Doesn't matter, I don't care if she goes to jail, but she needs to pay.  The new trend of women falsely claiming assault/rape in order to extort money or try to maintain their reputation, has to end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is how it always goes.  the woman sobers up and realizes mistake.  she won't show to court and this will be dismissed after a couple appearances by hardy.  hardy will only need to get this expunged from record, but he's already been hit where it hurts most -- public image.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is how it always goes.  the woman sobers up and realizes mistake.  she won't show to court and this will be dismissed after a couple appearances by hardy.  hardy will only need to get this expunged from record, but he's already been hit where it hurts most -- public image.  

Regarding your username, remember, they weren't AK-47's, they were "automatic looking weapons." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...